Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
92 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
69 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Released February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was unveiled within a month of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| TG-820 iHS | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k | 920k | Clearer screen (+110k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
| TG-820 iHS | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | February 2012 | February 2012 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 92 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Typically, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Clearly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2012-02-02 |
| Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT color LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 180 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 shots | 400 shots |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-90 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $500 | $871 |