Clicky

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

Portability
92
Imaging
35
Features
37
Overall
35
Olympus TG-820 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 front
Portability
69
Imaging
56
Features
45
Overall
51

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs

Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
  • 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
  • Launched February 2012
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 3200
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
  • 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
  • Released February 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview

Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a significant gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy different sensor measurements.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The TG-820 iHS was unveiled within a month of the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 and they are of a similar generation. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before diving straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summation of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

        

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 TG-820 iHS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
Screen resolution1030k920kClearer screen (+110k dot)

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS

 GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 TG-820 iHS 
Focus manually More accurate focus

Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5

 TG-820 iHS GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 
ReleasedFebruary 2012February 2012Similar generation
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen dimension3"3"Identical screen measurements
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison

For those who are intending to travel with your camera often, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides outside measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has proportions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") having a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 92 and 69 respectively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by looking at a spec sheet. The picture below may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.

Clearly, both of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-820 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF more difficult and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will give more detail having an extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively.

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Portrait photography details
26
includes face detect focus
no manual focus
no manual mode
can't use external flash
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
73
focusing manually
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect focus
exports RAW formats
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Street photography information
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Street photography information
61
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
fixed screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
55
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
does not have image stabilization
heavier than competition (550g)
Photography Glossary

Sports Comparison

Sports photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Sports photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
34
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking focus
environment proofing
slow frames per second (5.0 fps)
no shutter priority mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
no phase detect auto focus
48
good megapixels (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
very slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
does not have phase detect auto focus
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Travel Comparison

Travel photography with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Travel photography with Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
58
environment proofing
built-in flash
really wide (28mm)
no Timelapse recording
terrible battery pack (220 shots)
low megapixels (12MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
58
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
quite wide (24mm)
heavier than competition (550 grams)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Landscape photography camera
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 as a Landscape photography camera
38
really wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3")
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proofing
no manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
no manual mode
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
no RAW format
terrible battery pack (220 CIPA)
no Timelapse recording
62
focusing manually
quite wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
good megapixels (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
exports RAW formats
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
does not have image stabilization
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus TG-820 iHS Vlogging details
Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Vlogging details
33
really wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pixels)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.9)
screen is not selfie friendly
no microphone port
24
quite wide (24mm)
offers face detect focus
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
does not have image stabilization
low video resolution (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing mic support
heavier than competition (550g)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
 Olympus TG-820 iHSRicoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
General Information
Manufacturer Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus TG-820 iHS Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
Type Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Launched 2012-02-08 2012-02-02
Physical type Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor TruePic VI Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 370.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixel 16 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio - 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Maximum resolution 3968 x 2976 4928 x 3264
Maximum native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 200
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 28-140mm (5.0x) 24-85mm (3.5x)
Maximum aperture f/3.9-5.9 f/3.5-5.5
Macro focusing distance 1cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Type of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3 inch 3 inch
Display resolution 1,030 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch function
Display technology HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Lowest shutter speed 4 seconds 180 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/2000 seconds 1/3200 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 5.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation - Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 3.50 m -
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 MPEG-4
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 206 grams (0.45 lbs) 550 grams (1.21 lbs)
Dimensions 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 220 shots 400 shots
Battery style Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery ID LI-50B DB-90
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse recording
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/SDHC, Internal
Card slots One One
Retail pricing $500 $871