Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
59 Imaging
48 Features
43 Overall
46
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 793g - 142 x 101 x 70mm
- Introduced September 2006
- Replacement is Samsung GX-20
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung GX-10, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the GX-10 (10MP) is fairly well matched but the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-10 (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 5 years after the GX-10 which is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-10 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before delving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-820 iHS matches up vs the GX-10 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung GX-10. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung GX-10
TG-820 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | September 2006 | More modern by 66 months | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 1030k | 210k | Crisper display (+820k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-10 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
GX-10 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung GX-10
TG-820 iHS | GX-10 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera often, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung GX-10 has proportions of 142mm x 101mm x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") and a weight of 793 grams (1.75 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung GX-10 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the GX-10.
Using size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and GX-10 is 92 and 59 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by looking at a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and GX-10.
As you can see, each of these cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The TG-820 iHS using its tinier sensor will make getting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Olympus TG-820 iHS will give you more detail using its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The fresher TG-820 iHS is going to have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung GX-10 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung GX-10 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung GX-10 |
Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2006-09-21 |
Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 151 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
Display resolution | 1,030k dots | 210k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 793 grams (1.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 142 x 101 x 70mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photos | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $500 | $850 |