Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W
Portability
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Portability
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
Olympus TG-820 iHS
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Other Name is WB650
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Its time to look more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Samsung. The sensor resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is very similar and both cameras have the same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 21 months after the HZ35W making them a generation away from one another. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung HZ35W
| TG-820 iHS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2012 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 21 months |
| Display resolution | 1030k |  | 614k | Crisper display (+416k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| HZ35W | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung HZ35W
| TG-820 iHS | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got outside dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has proportions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung HZ35W in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you use at that time. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-820 iHS versus the HZ35W.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and HZ35W is 92 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic below may give you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and HZ35W.
All in all, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same MP so you should expect similar quality of photographs however you will need to factor the release date of the products into consideration. The fresher TG-820 iHS should have a benefit in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Portrait photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography highlights
includes face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
manual exposure not possible
can't use external flash
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
you can focus manually
provides face detection focusing
no external flash support
low megapixels (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Street photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Street photography camera
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
no articulating screen
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
screen is fixed
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Sports photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography factors
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes tracking autofocus
environment proof
low frames per second (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
not so great battery power (220 per charge)
lack of phase detect AF
amazing zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have phase detect AF
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS as a Travel photography camera
Samsung HZ35W as a Travel photography camera
environment proof
flash built-in
relatively wide (28mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
not so great battery power (220 shots)
low MP (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
slow max aperture (f3.9)
lighter than others in class (245 grams)
built-in flash
fairly wide (24mm)
great reach (360mm)
missing Timelapse mode
low megapixels (12MP)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS Landscape photography features
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography features
relatively wide (28mm)
screen size is good (3 inch)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
environment proof
lack of manual focus
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
manual exposure not possible
low MP (12 megapixels)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW files
not so great battery power (220 shots)
doesn't have Time Lapse recording
you can focus manually
fairly wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3")
image stabilization (Optical)
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
low megapixels (12MP)
sensor is very small (1/2.3")
doesn't have RAW files
missing Timelapse mode
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Vlogging with Olympus TG-820 iHS
Vlogging with Samsung HZ35W
relatively wide (28mm)
has image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
includes face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
slow max aperture (f3.9)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
doesn't have external mic support
fairly wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
lighter than others in class (245g)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f3.2)
doesn't offer selfie friendly display
low res video (1280 x 720 pixels)
missing external microphone support
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung HZ35W |
| Also referred to as | - | WB650 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 1,030k dots | 614k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 245 grams (0.54 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail price | $500 | $300 |