Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Announced April 2013
- Earlier Model is Samsung NX1000
- Successor is Samsung NX2000
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. There exists a considerable gap between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and NX1100 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and NX1100 (APS-C) feature different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-820 iHS was announced 14 months before the NX1100 which makes the cameras a generation apart from one another. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise summary of how the TG-820 iHS matches up versus the NX1100 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung NX1100. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung NX1100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung NX1100
TG-820 iHS | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen resolution | 1030k | 921k | Sharper screen (+109k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1100 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
NX1100 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | April 2013 | February 2012 | More recent by 14 months | |
Focus manually | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX1100
TG-820 iHS | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you have to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS comes with exterior measurements of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Samsung NX1100 has proportions of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") having a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you select during that time. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the NX1100.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and NX1100 is 92 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the difference between sensor measurements purely by reviewing specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-820 iHS and NX1100.
Plainly, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS having a tinier sensor is going to make getting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX1100 will deliver extra detail with its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots far more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX1100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX1100 |
Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2013-04-11 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 1,030 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 8.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 852 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 pictures | 320 pictures |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $500 | $600 |