Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/86c91/86c91f398b9f08f717ab882683d1c110f571f901" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS front Olympus TG-820 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/cfd15/cfd1574284728cc1e5386b2100b5855f4273a852" alt="Samsung NX300 front Samsung NX300 front"
86 Imaging
63 Features
73 Overall
67
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Released February 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.3" Tilting Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 331g - 122 x 64 x 41mm
- Announced November 2013
- Succeeded the Samsung NX210
- Replacement is Samsung NX500
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung NX300, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and NX300 (20MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and NX300 (APS-C) boast totally different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
The TG-820 iHS was unveiled 21 months earlier than the NX300 making them a generation apart from each other. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX300 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving straight to a thorough comparison, here is a short synopsis of how the TG-820 iHS scores against the NX300 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX300. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung NX300
TG-820 iHS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display resolution | 1030k | ![]() | 768k | Sharper display (+262k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX300 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
NX300 | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | November 2013 | ![]() | February 2012 | Fresher by 21 months |
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial precise focus | ||
Display type | Tilting | ![]() | Fixed | Tilting display |
Display size | 3.3" | ![]() | 3" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung NX300
TG-820 iHS | NX300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Samsung NX300 has dimensions of 122mm x 64mm x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 331 grams (0.73 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS versus Samsung NX300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Here is a front view size comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the NX300.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab3b6/ab3b6f2ef9d51fd5bb5ebe9a0883a849723f8d3e" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 size comparison"
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TG-820 iHS and NX300 is 92 and 86 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4add8/4add83cec2aabe13981c80d50dc600568fee0606" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is tough to envision the difference between sensor sizing purely by looking at technical specs. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and NX300.
As you have seen, both of those cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The TG-820 iHS with its tinier sensor will make getting shallow DOF harder and the Samsung NX300 will give you more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor innovation.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ac3f0/ac3f031cb9d1f0320e58821fc36d2dd46351eae1" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de894/de8949485979560d8ae36639c0cb65c1e20c1a7b" alt="Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung NX300 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung NX300 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-02-08 | 2013-11-24 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | DRIMe IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 247 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3.3" |
Display resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 768 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/6000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 9.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080, 1280 x 720, 640 x 480, 320 x 240 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 331 grams (0.73 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 122 x 64 x 41mm (4.8" x 2.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 76 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.6 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.7 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 942 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 330 images |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP1130 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at release | $500 | $750 |