Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
92 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Launched February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 23-483mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 218g - 111 x 65 x 22mm
- Released January 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Overview
Let's take a more detailed look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and WB800F (16MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-820 iHS was manufactured 11 months prior to the WB800F which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the WB800F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Samsung WB800F. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB800F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Samsung WB800F
| TG-820 iHS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 460k | Clearer screen (+570k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB800F over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| WB800F | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | More modern by 11 months |
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Samsung WB800F
| TG-820 iHS | WB800F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to consider its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-820 iHS provides physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Samsung WB800F has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") along with a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the WB800F.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and WB800F is 92 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes merely by looking through a spec sheet. The pic below should offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and WB800F.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Samsung WB800F to provide you with extra detail due to its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop photographs way more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Samsung WB800F Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB800F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Samsung WB800F |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2012-02-08 | 2013-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 23-483mm (21.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 3.50 m | - |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 206g (0.45 pounds) | 218g (0.48 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 111 x 65 x 22mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Price at release | $500 | $300 |