Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
78 Imaging
73 Features
59 Overall
67
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 45MP - APS-H Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sigma SA Mount
- n/ag - 147 x 95 x 91mm
- Introduced February 2016
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sigma Quattro H, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Sigma. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and Quattro H (45MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and Quattro H (APS-H) possess totally different sensor measurements.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-820 iHS was brought out 5 years prior to the Quattro H and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro H being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a thorough comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the TG-820 iHS grades against the Quattro H in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sigma sd Quattro H. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sigma Quattro H Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sigma Quattro H
TG-820 iHS | Quattro H |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro H over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
Quattro H | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2016 | February 2012 | More recent by 49 months | |
Focus manually | More precise focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 1620k | 1030k | Sharper screen (+590k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sigma Quattro H
TG-820 iHS | Quattro H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither includes Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Physical Comparison
If you're looking to lug around your camera, you will have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS features outer dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) and the Sigma Quattro H has dimensions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") along with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sigma Quattro H in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS vs the Quattro H.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and Quattro H is 92 and 78 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's difficult to see the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing a spec sheet. The visual below should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and Quattro H.
Clearly, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS featuring a smaller sensor will make shooting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Sigma Quattro H will produce more detail having its extra 33MP. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS will be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sigma Quattro H Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sigma sd Quattro H | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sigma sd Quattro H |
Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2016-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Dual TRUE III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-H |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 26.6 x 17.9mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 476.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 45 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 6200 x 4152 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
Available lenses | - | 76 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.4 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,620 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 3.8fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | - |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | BP-61 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $500 | $1,134 |