Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
78 Imaging
76 Features
65 Overall
71
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Revealed February 2012
(Full Review)
- 42MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 50 - 25600 (Boost to 102400)
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 35mm (F2.0) lens
- 507g - 113 x 65 x 72mm
- Introduced October 2015
- Earlier Model is Sony RX1R
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Overview
Here, we are evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sony. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and RX1R II (42MP) and the TG-820 iHS (1/2.3") and RX1R II (Full frame) boast different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was released 4 years earlier than the RX1R II and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. Both the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony RX1R II being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving into a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the RX1R II when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony RX1R II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony RX1R II
TG-820 iHS | RX1R II |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony RX1R II over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
RX1R II | TG-820 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | October 2015 | February 2012 | More recent by 44 months | |
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1229k | 1030k | Sharper display (+199k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony RX1R II
TG-820 iHS | RX1R II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Physical Comparison
When you are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you'll need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") along with a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony RX1R II has measurements of 113mm x 65mm x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 507 grams (1.12 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-820 iHS and the RX1R II.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-820 iHS and RX1R II is 92 and 78 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The visual underneath might provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-820 iHS and RX1R II.
Clearly, both of those cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The TG-820 iHS due to its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field more challenging and the Sony RX1R II will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 30 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The older TG-820 iHS is going to be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony RX1R II Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-RX1R II |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2012-02-08 | 2015-10-13 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | TruePic VI | BIONZ X |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Full frame |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 35.9 x 24mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 861.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 42MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 7952 x 5304 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | - | 102400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 50 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 25 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 35mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.0 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 14cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 1,030 thousand dot | 1,229 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Display technology | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Off, auto, fill flash, slow sync, rear sync, wireless |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 60i, 30p, 24p), 1280 x 720 (120p, 30p) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, XAVC S, H.264 |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lb) | 507 grams (1.12 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 113 x 65 x 72mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 2.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 97 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 25.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 3204 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 images | 220 images |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BX1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2,5, 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Memory Stick Pro Duo |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $500 | $3,300 |