Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Announced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-112mm (F3.0-5.8) lens
- 137g - 95 x 55 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2010
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Overview
Lets look a bit more in depth at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and the W310 (12MP) is relatively comparable and both cameras boast the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-820 iHS was introduced 2 years after the W310 which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-820 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W310 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-820 iHS grades vs the W310 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony W310 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony W310
TG-820 iHS | W310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2012 | January 2010 | Newer by 26 months | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 1030k | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W310 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
W310 | TG-820 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony W310
TG-820 iHS | W310 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Lack of manual focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to travel with your camera, you'll have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has got physical dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) whilst the Sony W310 has specifications of 95mm x 55mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at the time. Here is a front view scale comparison of the TG-820 iHS against the W310.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and W310 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's hard to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions only by going through technical specs. The pic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and W310.
As you have seen, both of the cameras have the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution so you can expect comparable quality of pictures but you will want to take the age of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-820 iHS is going to have a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W310 Specifications
Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W310 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Announced | 2012-02-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.0-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
Resolution of screen | 1,030 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 3.50 m | 3.00 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 206 gr (0.45 lb) | 137 gr (0.30 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 95 x 55 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 220 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $500 | $150 |