Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
96 Imaging
40 Features
33 Overall
37
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 206g - 101 x 65 x 26mm
- Introduced February 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-224mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
- 122g - 93 x 52 x 22mm
- Revealed January 2013
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Sony. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the TG-820 iHS (12MP) and W730 (16MP) but they feature the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-820 iHS was brought out 11 months earlier than the W730 which means that they are of a similar age. Both the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a concise highlight of how the TG-820 iHS matches up against the W730 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-820 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-820 iHS Gallery & Sony W730 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-820 iHS over the Sony W730
| TG-820 iHS | W730 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 1030k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+800k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W730 over the Olympus TG-820 iHS
| W730 | TG-820 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | January 2013 |  | February 2012 | Newer by 11 months |
| Touch screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-820 iHS and Sony W730
| TG-820 iHS | W730 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen |
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you will have to think about its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-820 iHS has external dimensions of 101mm x 65mm x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") accompanied by a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs) while the Sony W730 has proportions of 93mm x 52mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") along with a weight of 122 grams (0.27 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using at that moment. Underneath is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-820 iHS compared to the W730.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-820 iHS and W730 is 92 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to see the difference in sensor dimensions only by seeing technical specs. The picture below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-820 iHS and W730.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same resolution. You can count on the Sony W730 to provide more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged TG-820 iHS will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-820 iHS vs Sony W730 Specifications
| Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus TG-820 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W730 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2012-02-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-224mm (9.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-6.3 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of screen | 1,030k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen tech | HyperCrystal III TFT Color LCD | TFT LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 2s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 1.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 3.50 m | 2.80 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps)1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 206 grams (0.45 lbs) | 122 grams (0.27 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 101 x 65 x 26mm (4.0" x 2.6" x 1.0") | 93 x 52 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.0" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 220 images | 240 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch price | $500 | $138 |