Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f9979/f9979d6158b07faa33963a04f4938253f5f9ce99" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 front"
95 Imaging
33 Features
10 Overall
23
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1000 (Boost to 6400)
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-132mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 132g - 98 x 55 x 22mm
- Launched April 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and FS42 (10MP) and the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and FS42 (1/2.5") come with totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was brought out 3 years later than the FS42 and that is a fairly large difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FS42 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the FS42 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Panasonic FS42 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Panasonic FS42
TG-830 iHS | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | April 2009 | Fresher by 46 months |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FS42 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
FS42 | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FS42
TG-830 iHS | FS42 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | No manual focusing | ||
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS comes with outside measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") having a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Panasonic FS42 has measurements of 98mm x 55mm x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 132 grams (0.29 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you have chosen at that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-830 iHS compared to the FS42.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/36337/36337b47384e11b9e5163c20b79580dfdd8496fa" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and FS42 is 91 and 95 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/de750/de75088bb8c8058ca096bdaeab539a13fc2f87d2" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor sizing simply by viewing a spec sheet. The graphic below will give you a more clear sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-830 iHS and FS42.
As you can see, both of these cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The TG-830 iHS because of its larger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Olympus TG-830 iHS will provide you with extra detail having its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos much more aggressively. The fresher TG-830 iHS is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d8500/d850064d4a35cb8ae367e11901ec8b595c31a4b0" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c54d/4c54d3e6895bea9434d0bfe90e1f8c5e0272e141" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FS42 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FS42 |
Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2009-04-17 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1000 |
Maximum enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 33-132mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 6.3 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 6.30 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 grams (0.47 lbs) | 132 grams (0.29 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 22mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $0 | $580 |