Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/708ca/708ca63198576f0ffc46689e66eb690a812d18d4" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 front"
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Announced July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
Here, we are looking at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but both cameras offer the identical sensor size (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was brought out 2 years after the FZ35 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the TG-830 iHS grades against the FZ35 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Panasonic FZ35
TG-830 iHS | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2013 | ![]() | July 2010 | Newer by 31 months |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
Display resolution | 460k | ![]() | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
FZ35 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Panasonic FZ35
TG-830 iHS | FZ35 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Lack of selfie screen | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are going to travel with your camera regularly, you're going to have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got physical dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FZ35 has proportions of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") along with a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you are employing during that time. Below is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS compared to the FZ35.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/882cb/882cb7de7a383909f241793f468ddb42f747f02e" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 size comparison"
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-830 iHS and FZ35 is 91 and 72 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f8d8d/f8d8dddbc3fe936acefcef2b8fc251f69d48262a" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions only by checking technical specs. The picture underneath will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and FZ35.
As you can tell, both of the cameras feature the identical sensor size but different megapixels. You should anticipate the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give more detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics way more aggressively. The more modern TG-830 iHS should have an edge in sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/e7de5/e7de555947e7974b6496a3f68409032de130c6c0" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0c9f5/0c9f53a43230f4ece1b3bac9cfefd122e1574305" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2010-07-06 |
Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine V |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | - | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 8.50 m |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264 | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 gr (0.47 lbs) | 397 gr (0.88 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 shots | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch price | $0 | $999 |