Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/103c7/103c75a67dcbfed70caf5bb728c64082ed228093" alt="Ricoh CX2 front Ricoh CX2 front"
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2009
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Below is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh CX2, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they enjoy the exact same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was unveiled 3 years later than the CX2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a more detailed comparison, below is a brief summary of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the CX2 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Ricoh CX2. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh CX2
TG-830 iHS | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | ![]() | August 2009 | More recent by 42 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
CX2 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 920k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh CX2
TG-830 iHS | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display dimension | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Identical display dimensions |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Missing selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Missing Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you are going to need to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has external dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX2 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh CX2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Remember, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose during that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-830 iHS and the CX2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b7a53/b7a536eb5470c54b2141066b5ff4ff0046b1b04e" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison"
Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and CX2 is 91 and 93 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c4146/c41467907f0eaf2387aca714a212fea900eedfa6" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to imagine the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The photograph below will provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and CX2.
As you can plainly see, the 2 cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give you extra detail having an extra 7MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics much more aggressively. The younger TG-830 iHS provides an edge with regard to sensor tech.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b4c48/b4c48746a9cbc0d7c680e56283b49131375e7703" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a24d1/a24d1af0743df3c5e3495465e61c6c2201daf20f" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh CX2 |
Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-08 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 9MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 460k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 gr (0.47 lb) | 185 gr (0.41 lb) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | DB-70 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $0 | $341 |