Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
92 Imaging
33 Features
35 Overall
33
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 206g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Announced June 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Overview
On this page, we are comparing the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a big gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and CX3 (10MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-830 iHS was released 2 years after the CX3 which is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before diving straight to a complete comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-830 iHS grades vs the CX3 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh CX3. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Ricoh CX3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Ricoh CX3
| TG-830 iHS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | June 2010 | Newer by 32 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX3 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
| CX3 | TG-830 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Display resolution | 920k |  | 460k | Sharper display (+460k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Ricoh CX3
| TG-830 iHS | CX3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lack of Touch display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Physical Comparison
If you are planning to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-830 iHS has got outside dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX3 has specifications of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 206 grams (0.45 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-830 iHS against the CX3.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and CX3 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions only by looking at technical specs. The image below may give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and CX3.
As you have seen, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different MP. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-830 iHS to give extra detail as a result of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution will also make it easier to crop photos more aggressively. The newer TG-830 iHS should have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Ricoh CX3 Specifications
| Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh CX3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Ricoh CX3 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-06-16 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214g (0.47 lb) | 206g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-50B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $0 | $329 |