Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100
91 Imaging
39 Features
40 Overall
39
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7ddda/7ddda2c742e5091781c9a412322b0944785f369d" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS front Olympus TG-830 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a7c2/5a7c200f7198b7d871a7cc0f294d85a2774e776e" alt="Samsung NX1100 front Samsung NX1100 front"
90 Imaging
62 Features
60 Overall
61
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Released January 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 222g - 114 x 63 x 37mm
- Launched April 2013
- Superseded the Samsung NX1000
- Refreshed by Samsung NX2000
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Overview
Its time to look more in depth at the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Samsung NX1100, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the NX1100 (20MP) is very comparable but the TG-830 iHS (1/2.3") and NX1100 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizing.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The TG-830 iHS was revealed 3 months earlier than the NX1100 which means that they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX1100 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-830 iHS grades versus the NX1100 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung NX1100. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Samsung NX1100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Samsung NX1100
TG-830 iHS | NX1100 |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung NX1100 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
NX1100 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | More precise focus | ||
Display resolution | 921k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Samsung NX1100
TG-830 iHS | NX1100 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | ![]() | April 2013 | Same generation |
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display measurement |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Absent Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-830 iHS features external dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) and the Samsung NX1100 has sizing of 114mm x 63mm x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") with a weight of 222 grams (0.49 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Samsung NX1100 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Underneath is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-830 iHS vs the NX1100.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/0e894/0e894862bf4a6e2b7c127ecaeeeb707c43769d09" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 size comparison"
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and NX1100 is 91 and 90 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/d035f/d035f08d5664010bee4621ad0252a60cd11e6147" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the gap in sensor sizes only by checking out a spec sheet. The pic below might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-830 iHS and NX1100.
As you can see, both cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TG-830 iHS having a smaller sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field more difficult and the Samsung NX1100 will produce extra detail because of its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ad353/ad353727310aac8ee57140160dac2d96b873d64e" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8302d/8302d10a979edc1e8f5d4baa60a5ce1fcbaf6eb0" alt="Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Samsung NX1100 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung NX1100 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Samsung |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Samsung NX1100 |
Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2013-01-08 | 2013-04-11 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 5472 x 3648 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | - |
Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 32 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 8.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | no built-in flash |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) | 222 gr (0.49 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 114 x 63 x 37mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 852 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | 320 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | LI-50B | BC1030 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $0 | $600 |