Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
88 Imaging
34 Features
54 Overall
42
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F1.8-2.4) lens
- 386g - 114 x 63 x 29mm
- Launched July 2010
- Alternative Name is EX1
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Overview
Below, we will be reviewing the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Ricoh and Samsung. There exists a big gap between the resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and TL500 (10MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and TL500 (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor measurements.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe WG-M1 was released 4 years later than the TL500 and that is quite a big gap as far as technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a detailed comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the WG-M1 scores vs the TL500 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL500. The complete galleries are viewable at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery and Samsung TL500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung TL500
| WG-M1 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | September 2014 |  | July 2010 | More recent by 51 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL500 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| TL500 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Very exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fully Articulated |  | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.5" | Bigger screen (+1.5") |
| Screen resolution | 614k |  | 115k | Crisper screen (+499k dot) |
| Selfie screen |  | Easy selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL500
| WG-M1 | TL500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch screen |  | Neither comes with Touch screen |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 comes with outer measurements of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) and the Samsung TL500 has specifications of 114mm x 63mm x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") along with a weight of 386 grams (0.85 lbs).
Analyze the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung TL500 in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you choose at that moment. The following is the front view sizing comparison of the WG-M1 and the TL500.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the WG-M1 and TL500 is 91 and 88 respectively.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it's hard to visualise the contrast between sensor measurements simply by reviewing technical specs. The graphic underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the WG-M1 and TL500.
As you have seen, both cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The WG-M1 featuring a tinier sensor will make achieving shallower DOF more challenging and the Ricoh WG-M1 will deliver greater detail as a result of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent WG-M1 will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung TL500 Specifications
| Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Ricoh | Samsung |
| Model type | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung TL500 |
| Also called as | - | EX1 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2010-07-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 14MP | 10MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 800 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | (1×) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.8 | f/1.8-2.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
| Display size | 1.5" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 115 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | - | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 10.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.20 m |
| Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow syncro, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 190 grams (0.42 lb) | 386 grams (0.85 lb) |
| Dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 114 x 63 x 29mm (4.5" x 2.5" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | 40 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 19.2 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 129 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | DB-65 | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | - | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC, internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Retail cost | $2,000 | $527 |
