Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
91 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 245g - 105 x 59 x 34mm
- Introduced July 2011
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Overview
The following is a in depth assessment of the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony HX9V, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Sony. The resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the HX9V (16MP) is relatively close and both cameras boast the identical sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-830 iHS was released 18 months after the HX9V which makes them a generation away from one another. Each of the cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a more detailed comparison, here is a simple synopsis of how the TG-830 iHS matches up versus the HX9V for portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Sony HX9V Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony HX9V
TG-830 iHS | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2011 | Newer by 18 months |
Reasons to pick Sony HX9V over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
HX9V | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony HX9V
TG-830 iHS | HX9V | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you are going to need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS offers outer dimensions of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Sony HX9V has dimensions of 105mm x 59mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony HX9V in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS compared to the HX9V.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-830 iHS and HX9V is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be tough to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions simply by looking through technical specs. The image here might provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-830 iHS and HX9V.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical sensor size and the identical MP therefore you should expect comparable quality of images though you should always consider the release date of the cameras into account. The fresher TG-830 iHS will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony HX9V Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Olympus | Sony |
Model type | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-HX9V |
Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2011-07-19 |
Physical type | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | BIONZ |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | - |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 460k dots | 921k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display tech | - | XtraFine LCD display with TruBlack technology |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | - | 10.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.00 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720 (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 214 gr (0.47 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 105 x 59 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI-50B | NP-BG1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $0 | $328 |