Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
95 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Launched January 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F3.5-4.6) lens
- 149g - 98 x 60 x 18mm
- Introduced July 2010
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Sony TX9, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Sony. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and TX9 (12MP) but they feature the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-830 iHS was launched 2 years later than the TX9 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony TX9 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going in to a full comparison, below is a simple overview of how the TG-830 iHS scores against the TX9 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus TG-830 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery & Sony TX9 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony TX9
TG-830 iHS | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2013 | July 2010 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Sony TX9 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
TX9 | TG-830 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimension | 3.5" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 922k | 460k | Sharper screen (+462k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony TX9
TG-830 iHS | TX9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to lug around your camera, you should take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-830 iHS enjoys exterior measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) whilst the Sony TX9 has specifications of 98mm x 60mm x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 149 grams (0.33 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-830 iHS versus Sony TX9 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are working with at that time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-830 iHS vs the TX9.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and TX9 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is hard to visualize the difference between sensor measurements just by going over specs. The photograph here might offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and TX9.
All in all, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You can expect the Olympus TG-830 iHS to deliver extra detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop shots much more aggressively. The more recent TG-830 iHS provides a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony TX9 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-TX9 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2013-01-08 | 2010-07-08 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect autofocus | ||
Contract detect autofocus | ||
Phase detect autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
Max aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/3.5-4.6 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3.5" |
Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 922 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | - | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.80 m |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 1920 x 1080 (50 fps), 1440 x 1080 (50, 25fps), 1280 x 720 (25 fps), 640 x 480 (25 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | AVCHD |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 pounds) | 149g (0.33 pounds) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 60 x 18mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 pictures | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec, portrait1/ portrait2) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/ SDHC/ SDXC, Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at launch | $0 | $799 |