Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330
91 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
96 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.9-5.9) lens
- 214g - 109 x 67 x 28mm
- Revealed January 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.7-5.7) lens
- 128g - 96 x 57 x 17mm
- Launched January 2010
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Sony. The sensor resolution of the TG-830 iHS (16MP) and the W330 (14MP) is relatively close and they enjoy the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe TG-830 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the W330 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Olympus TG-830 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony W330 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the TG-830 iHS scores vs the W330 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-830 iHS Gallery and Sony W330 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-830 iHS over the Sony W330
TG-830 iHS | W330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | January 2010 | Fresher by 37 months | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W330 over the Olympus TG-830 iHS
W330 | TG-830 iHS |
---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-830 iHS and Sony W330
TG-830 iHS | W330 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera, you need to factor its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-830 iHS enjoys outer measurements of 109mm x 67mm x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Sony W330 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 128 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view dimension comparison of the TG-830 iHS and the W330.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-830 iHS and W330 is 91 and 96 respectively.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is difficult to visualise the contrast in sensor sizing just by researching specifications. The visual below may give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-830 iHS and W330.
To sum up, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You should count on the Olympus TG-830 iHS to render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop photographs much more aggressively. The newer TG-830 iHS is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-830 iHS vs Sony W330 Specifications
Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
Model | Olympus TG-830 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W330 |
Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2013-01-08 | 2010-01-07 |
Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 9 |
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 28-140mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
Largest aperture | f/3.9-5.9 | f/2.7-5.7 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 4cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 2 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 180 (30fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 214g (0.47 lbs) | 128g (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 109 x 67 x 28mm (4.3" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 96 x 57 x 17mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | - |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-50B | NP-BN1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, pet auto shutter) | Yes (2 sec or 10 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Memory Stick Duo / Pro Duo / Pro HG-Duo, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $0 | $170 |