Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
85 Imaging
37 Features
67 Overall
49
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 346g - 113 x 65 x 48mm
- Introduced December 2012
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Overview
The following is a complete comparison of the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact and both of them are manufactured by Olympus. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the XZ-2 iHS (12MP) is relatively similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and XZ-2 iHS (1/1.7") enjoy different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was brought out 7 months prior to the XZ-2 iHS so they are of a similar age. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS matches up vs the XZ-2 iHS with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Olympus XZ-2 iHS. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Olympus XZ-2 iHS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-1 iHS | XZ-2 iHS |
|---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-2 iHS over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| XZ-2 iHS | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | December 2012 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 7 months |
| Manual focus |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen type | Tilting |  | Fixed | Tilting screen |
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Olympus XZ-2 iHS
| TG-1 iHS | XZ-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to travel with your camera, you need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has got external dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") having a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-2 iHS has dimensions of 113mm x 65mm x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") along with a weight of 346 grams (0.76 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Olympus XZ-2 iHS in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you select at that moment. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the XZ-2 iHS.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and XZ-2 iHS is 91 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its hard to imagine the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reviewing a spec sheet. The image here will help offer you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and XZ-2 iHS.
Clearly, the 2 cameras offer the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor dimensions. The TG-1 iHS includes the tinier sensor which should make obtaining shallower DOF more difficult. The more aged TG-1 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Olympus XZ-2 iHS Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Olympus XZ-2 iHS |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2012-12-18 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/1.8-2.5 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Tilting |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dots | 920k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 346g (0.76 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 113 x 65 x 48mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 49 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 20.4 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 11.3 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 216 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 340 pictures |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | Li-90B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $399 | $450 |