Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9548e/9548e39ccb5afab6cfb852bfe92d7158e2c24b0d" alt="Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9a056/9a0560529b2d7cdf5610656aaa640a5f52dfa356" alt="Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 front"
88 Imaging
47 Features
50 Overall
48
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Revealed May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 310g - 113 x 68 x 33mm
- Revealed February 2011
- Older Model is Panasonic GF1
- Updated by Panasonic GF3
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the GF2 (12MP) is fairly similar but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and GF2 (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor size.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
The TG-1 iHS was announced 15 months later than the GF2 making them a generation apart from one another. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic GF2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a simple highlight of how the TG-1 iHS matches up against the GF2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Panasonic GF2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Panasonic GF2
TG-1 iHS | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | May 2012 | ![]() | February 2011 | Fresher by 15 months |
Display resolution | 610k | ![]() | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GF2 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
GF2 | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | ![]() | Very accurate focus | ||
Touch display | ![]() | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Panasonic GF2
TG-1 iHS | GF2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | ![]() | Fixed | Fixed display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 3" | Same display size |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to carry your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Panasonic GF2 has specifications of 113mm x 68mm x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 310 grams (0.68 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are using at that time. The following is a front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the GF2.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/fbcae/fbcae2a9c4bd873819963fbe6f33059728e150fa" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 size comparison"
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-1 iHS and GF2 is 91 and 88 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/5a222/5a222e798bdcfefd0fd31316a0e1ee3883cdeb99" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 top view buttons comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Sensor Comparison
Normally, its tough to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The photograph below will give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and GF2.
Plainly, both of the cameras come with the identical megapixels but not the same sensor sizing. The TG-1 iHS uses the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallow DOF tougher. The younger TG-1 iHS will have an advantage when it comes to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c5463/c5463e56f51e7b7b314a04b914d1e65405f27546" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 sensor size comparison"
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/48859/48859956117618885a763b532afdcf06268202ee" alt="Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Panasonic GF2 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GF2 |
Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-05-08 | 2011-02-24 |
Physical type | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | TruePic VI | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 23 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of display | 610k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 6.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720p (60, 30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | H.264 | AVCHD, Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 310g (0.68 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 113 x 68 x 33mm (4.4" x 2.7" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 54 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.2 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.3 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 506 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 300 images |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images)) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail price | $399 | $330 |