Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
77 Imaging
51 Features
31 Overall
43
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Introduced November 2009
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
In this write-up, we will be contrasting the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) is relatively well matched but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) possess different sensor dimensions.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was revealed 2 years later than the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go straight into a detailed comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The full galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| TG-1 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | November 2009 | More recent by 31 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Sharper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
| TG-1 iHS | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither provides Touch screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
If you are going to lug around your camera frequently, you will want to take into account its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS provides exterior dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view sizing comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 91 and 77 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to picture the gap between sensor measurements simply by reading through specifications. The graphic below might provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, both cameras enjoy the same exact megapixels albeit different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS includes the tinier sensor which is going to make obtaining shallower depth of field more challenging. The fresher TG-1 iHS should have a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2009-11-10 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | GR engine III |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4288 x 2848 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5 |
| Macro focusing range | - | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.00 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 453 gr (1.00 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | 320 photographs |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Price at launch | $399 | $566 |