Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
95 Imaging
36 Features
30 Overall
33
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Launched May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 4800 (Increase to 6400)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 31-217mm (F3.3-5.5) lens
- 160g - 104 x 58 x 20mm
- Introduced January 2010
- Other Name is ST5500
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by competitors Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the CL80 (14MP) is very close and they enjoy the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-1 iHS was introduced 2 years later than the CL80 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL80 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight into a in depth comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the TG-1 iHS grades against the CL80 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung CL80. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung CL80 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung CL80
| TG-1 iHS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2012 |  | January 2010 | Fresher by 29 months |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL80 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| CL80 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display sizing | 3.7" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.7") |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung CL80
| TG-1 iHS | CL80 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung CL80 has sizing of 104mm x 58mm x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-1 iHS and the CL80.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and CL80 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is tough to visualize the gap in sensor sizing simply by researching technical specs. The graphic below may offer you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and CL80.
As you can tell, both the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung CL80 to render greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos far more aggressively. The more modern TG-1 iHS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung CL80 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung CL80 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung CL80 |
| Otherwise known as | - | ST5500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Launched | 2012-05-08 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 14MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4334 x 3256 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 4800 |
| Max enhanced ISO | - | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 31-217mm (7.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.5 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3.7 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 160g (0.35 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 104 x 58 x 20mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch price | $399 | $400 |