Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210
91 Imaging
35 Features
40 Overall
37
94 Imaging
37 Features
45 Overall
40
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600 (Expand to 3200)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-288mm (F2.9-5.9) lens
- 174g - 101 x 59 x 22mm
- Announced July 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Overview
Below is a extended analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung WB210, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the WB210 (14MP) is pretty well matched and they use the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was brought out 10 months later than the WB210 which means that they are both of a similar age. Both cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-1 iHS scores against the WB210 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Samsung WB210. The entire galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Samsung WB210 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Samsung WB210
| TG-1 iHS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2012 |  | July 2011 | More recent by 10 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 1k | Clearer screen (+609k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB210 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| WB210 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen dimension | 3.5" |  | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Touch friendly screen |  | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung WB210
| TG-1 iHS | WB210 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither comes with selfie screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is intending to lug around your camera, you will need to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-1 iHS comes with outside dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Samsung WB210 has sizing of 101mm x 59mm x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") and a weight of 174 grams (0.38 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Samsung WB210 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the WB210.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the TG-1 iHS and WB210 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements purely by looking at specs. The photograph underneath may give you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and WB210.
As you can plainly see, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same resolution. You can expect the Samsung WB210 to resolve extra detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-1 iHS will have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Samsung WB210 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung WB210 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Samsung WB210 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Released | 2012-05-08 | 2011-07-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Highest enhanced ISO | - | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-288mm (12.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.9-5.9 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 1 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 174 grams (0.38 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 59 x 22mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | microSC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $399 | $279 |