Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
83 Imaging
56 Features
33 Overall
46
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 640 x 480 video
- 50mm (F2.8) lens
- 330g - 122 x 67 x 59mm
- Launched February 2012
- Earlier Model is Sigma DP1 Merrill
- Refreshed by Sigma DP3 Merrill
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Overview
Below is a extended comparison of the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Large Sensor Compact by companies Olympus and Sigma. The image resolution of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and the DP2 Merrill (15MP) is pretty close but the TG-1 iHS (1/2.3") and DP2 Merrill (APS-C) posses totally different sensor measurements.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-1 iHS was brought out 3 months later than the DP2 Merrill and they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sigma DP2 Merrill being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before getting right into a in depth comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS matches up versus the DP2 Merrill with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS & Sigma DP2 Merrill. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery & Sigma DP2 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sigma DP2 Merrill
TG-1 iHS | DP2 Merrill |
---|
Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Merrill over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
DP2 Merrill | TG-1 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 610k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sigma DP2 Merrill
TG-1 iHS | DP2 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2012 | February 2012 | Same age | |
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Missing Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Physical Comparison
If you are intending to lug around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-1 iHS features outer dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Sigma DP2 Merrill has proportions of 122mm x 67mm x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") with a weight of 330 grams (0.73 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sigma DP2 Merrill in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is a front view physical size comparison of the TG-1 iHS vs the DP2 Merrill.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and DP2 Merrill is 91 and 83 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be hard to visualise the difference in sensor measurements merely by viewing a spec sheet. The visual underneath will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-1 iHS and DP2 Merrill.
Clearly, both the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-1 iHS due to its smaller sensor will make achieving shallower DOF trickier and the Sigma DP2 Merrill will result in greater detail having its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sigma DP2 Merrill Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sigma DP2 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Olympus | Sigma |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sigma DP2 Merrill |
Category | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-05-08 | 2012-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | TruePic VI | Dual TRUE II engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 15 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | - |
Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4704 x 3136 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 610k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4 secs | - |
Max shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | no built-in flash |
Flash settings | - | no built-in flash |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640x480 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230g (0.51 lb) | 330g (0.73 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 122 x 67 x 59mm (4.8" x 2.6" x 2.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | LI90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage slots | One | One |
Launch cost | $399 | $931 |