Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200
91 Imaging
36 Features
40 Overall
37
67 Imaging
44 Features
31 Overall
38
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 112 x 67 x 30mm
- Announced May 2012
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-633mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 530g - 123 x 83 x 87mm
- Announced January 2013
Photography Glossary Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Overview
The following is a detailed analysis of the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony H200, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Olympus and Sony. There is a crucial difference among the resolutions of the TG-1 iHS (12MP) and H200 (20MP) but they use the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-1 iHS was introduced 8 months earlier than the H200 so they are of a similar generation. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-1 iHS being a Compact camera and the Sony H200 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving straight into a detailed comparison, below is a simple synopsis of how the TG-1 iHS scores vs the H200 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS and Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-1 iHS Gallery and Sony H200 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-1 iHS over the Sony H200
| TG-1 iHS | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+150k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony H200 over the Olympus TG-1 iHS
| H200 | TG-1 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2013 |  | May 2012 | Newer by 8 months |
Common features in the Olympus TG-1 iHS and Sony H200
| TG-1 iHS | H200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display size |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Lacking Touch display |
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-1 iHS has outer dimensions of 112mm x 67mm x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony H200 has dimensions of 123mm x 83mm x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") and a weight of 530 grams (1.17 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-1 iHS versus Sony H200 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing at that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-1 iHS compared to the H200.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the TG-1 iHS and H200 is 91 and 67 respectively.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is tough to picture the gap in sensor dimensions only by seeing specifications. The image underneath might offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-1 iHS and H200.
Plainly, both cameras offer the same exact sensor sizing but different MP. You should anticipate the Sony H200 to show extra detail using its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics a little more aggressively. The more aged TG-1 iHS will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-1 iHS vs Sony H200 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Sony |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-1 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-H200 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2012-05-08 | 2013-01-08 |
| Body design | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VI | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5184 x 2920 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-633mm (26.4x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | - | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Display resolution | 610k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | - | ClearPhoto LCD display |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1500s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames/s | 8.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 6.80 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow Sync, Advanced Flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 530 grams (1.17 lb) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 67 x 30mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 123 x 83 x 87mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 3.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | LI90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Portrait 1/2) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Duo/Memory Stick Pro Duo, Memory Stick Pro-HG Duo |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Price at release | $399 | $250 |