Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
36 Features
21 Overall
30
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-140mm (F2.8-6.9) lens
- 165g - 98 x 55 x 24mm
- Revealed January 2010
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-FS11
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Overview
Its time to look a little more in depth at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH3, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the FH3 (14MP) is fairly comparable and both cameras posses the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was announced 3 years after the FH3 which is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise summation of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the FH3 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FH3 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FH3
| TG-2 iHS | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | More modern by 43 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH3 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| FH3 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FH3
| TG-2 iHS | FH3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | No Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Panasonic FH3 has specifications of 98mm x 55mm x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") having a weight of 165 grams (0.36 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FH3 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use during that time. Below is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS compared to the FH3.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and FH3 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to visualize the contrast in sensor sizes purely by going through specifications. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and FH3.
Plainly, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should anticipate the Panasonic FH3 to show greater detail with its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop images more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS provides an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FH3 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH3 |
| Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FS11 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-6.9 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/1600s |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 6.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.80 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lb) | 165 gr (0.36 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 55 x 24mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch cost | $380 | $160 |