Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20
91 Imaging
38 Features
22 Overall
31
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62a6a/62a6a983a6af3568f6b39137b109a895b4f78a46" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 front Ricoh WG-M1 front"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/671a5/671a501058fd191a3574d7183c0ab71c6e38e06c" alt="Samsung NX20 front Samsung NX20 front"
83 Imaging
61 Features
73 Overall
65
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Launched September 2014
(Full Review)
- 20MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 12800
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Samsung NX Mount
- 341g - 122 x 90 x 40mm
- Launched April 2012
- Previous Model is Samsung NX11
- Renewed by Samsung NX30
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8876b/8876ba1234536f7f948b3ad54614ecbba59fd0b6" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Overview
Here, we are contrasting the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Ricoh and Samsung. There is a sizable difference among the image resolutions of the WG-M1 (14MP) and NX20 (20MP) and the WG-M1 (1/2.3") and NX20 (APS-C) offer different sensor sizes.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/40b17/40b178b2c2a7887c950c5d80f9aa0bc017ad9376" alt=""
The WG-M1 was launched 2 years after the NX20 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Ricoh WG-M1 being a Compact camera and the Samsung NX20 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving right into a more detailed comparison, here is a short view of how the WG-M1 matches up vs the NX20 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9df93/9df93b830615ba08ba0f7e31492fca23710a884c" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Ricoh WG-M1 & Samsung NX20. The complete galleries are provided at Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery & Samsung NX20 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Samsung NX20
WG-M1 | NX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | September 2014 | ![]() | April 2012 | Newer by 30 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung NX20 over the Ricoh WG-M1
NX20 | WG-M1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | ![]() | Dial accurate focusing | ||
Display type | Fully Articulated | ![]() | Fixed | Fully Articulating display |
Display size | 3" | ![]() | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
Display resolution | 614k | ![]() | 115k | Crisper display (+499k dot) |
Selfie screen | ![]() | Take selfies |
Common features in the Ricoh WG-M1 and Samsung NX20
WG-M1 | NX20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | ![]() | Neither features Touch friendly display |
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera regularly, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Ricoh WG-M1 enjoys external dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") with a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs) while the Samsung NX20 has specifications of 122mm x 90mm x 40mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.6") with a weight of 341 grams (0.75 lbs).
Look at the Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/a6ef8/a6ef8f16e8deba30cb986caafd44d83681e96a75" alt="Camera Size Comparison with Lenses Camera Size Comparison with Lenses"
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with at that time. Following is a front view scale comparison of the WG-M1 compared to the NX20.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/23606/236066f2f468377355fbf46f6321c62fded6a021" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 size comparison"
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the WG-M1 and NX20 is 91 and 83 respectively.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c6c17/c6c17ce51125ce76ec14e8c33a90024e8f4aac07" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 top view buttons comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 top view buttons comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's hard to picture the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by looking through a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the WG-M1 and NX20.
As you can see, both of these cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The WG-M1 featuring a smaller sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF trickier and the Samsung NX20 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images a good deal more aggressively. The more modern WG-M1 should have an edge with regard to sensor technology.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1b3be/1b3be12eb03ed5c4813915e47eda9f2be10b90f9" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 sensor size comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 sensor size comparison"
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Screen and ViewFinder
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b70fb/b70fb6fdb522f4359f2ac82b7e91d56f36a24682" alt="Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4fad8/4fad8be6e5d8cb84d21f21424f73546c57bfca20" alt=""
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/bfda9/bfda97b4ea42610c4d033bdc3102b7af07982c04" alt=""
Street Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/427ef/427ef51d855b8f8d8523699aa2b0465afb765511" alt=""
Sports Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c3338/c3338e925c8d47c26e739e490d039a1411046530" alt=""
Travel Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6d588/6d5886e45f6ed46a44c58516180e79dc4c09297f" alt=""
Landscape Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/09f89/09f89c6b5dc0c8e793ce323afb658e7f43d45612" alt=""
Vlogging Comparison
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/85299/85299aa0d77ee8b6a2d3435fdb68ab0ccaabf584" alt=""
Ricoh WG-M1 vs Samsung NX20 Specifications
Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX20 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Ricoh | Samsung |
Model | Ricoh WG-M1 | Samsung NX20 |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2014-09-12 | 2012-04-20 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 14 megapixel | 20 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 4320 x 3240 | 5472 x 3648 |
Max native ISO | 800 | 12800 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 15 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Samsung NX |
Lens focal range | (1×) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Available lenses | - | 32 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 1.5" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 115k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Display tech | - | Active Matrix OLED screen |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.7x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | - | 30 seconds |
Fastest shutter speed | - | 1/8000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 10.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 11.00 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, 1st/2nd Curtain, Smart Flash, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1920 x 810 (24 fps) 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
Video data format | H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | Optional |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 190 gr (0.42 lbs) | 341 gr (0.75 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") | 122 x 90 x 40mm (4.8" x 3.5" x 1.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 75 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.9 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 785 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | 360 pictures |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | DB-65 | BP1130 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2 sec to 30 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | microSD/microSDHC, internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $2,000 | $1,100 |