Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
53 Imaging
53 Features
81 Overall
64
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 125 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 24-480mm (F2.8-4.5) lens
- 915g - 138 x 102 x 135mm
- Released September 2016
- Other Name is Lumix DMC-FZ2000
- Succeeded the Panasonic FZ1000
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Overview
Below is a in depth analysis of the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ2500, one being a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There is a big difference between the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and FZ2500 (20MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and FZ2500 (1") have totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 4 years before the FZ2500 and that is quite a big gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ2500 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go right into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick view of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the FZ2500 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Panasonic FZ2500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Panasonic FZ2500
TG-2 iHS | FZ2500 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ2500 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
FZ2500 | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2016 | June 2013 | More recent by 39 months | |
Manually focus | Very exact focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 610k | Sharper display (+430k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Panasonic FZ2500
TG-2 iHS | FZ2500 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display sizing |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to lug around your camera frequently, you will have to take into account its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-2 iHS comes with physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ2500 has sizing of 138mm x 102mm x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") with a weight of 915 grams (2.02 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Panasonic FZ2500 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the FZ2500.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and FZ2500 is 91 and 53 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it is very tough to envision the contrast between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual here may give you a better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-2 iHS and FZ2500.
To sum up, both cameras provide different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS due to its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower depth of field more difficult and the Panasonic FZ2500 will give you greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop pics more aggressively. The older TG-2 iHS is going to be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Panasonic FZ2500 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ2500 |
Also Known as | - | Lumix DMC-FZ2000 |
Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 13.2 x 8.8mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 116.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 5472 x 3648 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Maximum boosted ISO | - | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW support | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | - | 80 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 49 |
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.7 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 610k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen technology | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 secs |
Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 12.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 13.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync, Slow Sync/Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 4096 x 2060 @ 24p / 100 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 4096x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 915 grams (2.02 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 138 x 102 x 135mm (5.4" x 4.0" x 5.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 70 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.0 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 538 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 350 photographs |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | Li-90B | DMW-BLC12 |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 3 shots @ 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $380 | $998 |