Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
92 Imaging
33 Features
34 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Announced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 205g - 102 x 59 x 29mm
- Introduced August 2010
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Overview
Below, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the CX4 (10MP) is pretty similar and they enjoy the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-2 iHS was launched 2 years after the CX4 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-2 iHS grades vs the CX4 for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Ricoh CX4. The complete galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh CX4 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh CX4
| TG-2 iHS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | June 2013 |  | August 2010 | More modern by 35 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX4 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| CX4 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 920k |  | 610k | Crisper screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh CX4
| TG-2 iHS | CX4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 3" | Identical screen sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | No Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you should factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outside measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh CX4 has dimensions of 102mm x 59mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 205 grams (0.45 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you select at the time. The following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the CX4.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and CX4 is 91 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's difficult to see the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading technical specs. The image below may provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and CX4.
As you can tell, each of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Olympus TG-2 iHS to offer greater detail utilizing its extra 2MP. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The fresher TG-2 iHS is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh CX4 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh CX4 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh CX4 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2013-06-28 | 2010-08-19 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 5.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 lbs) | 205g (0.45 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 102 x 59 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photos | - |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | DB-100 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $380 | $211 |