Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Revealed June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Released March 2010
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively similar but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
TG-2 iHS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | June 2013 | March 2010 | More recent by 40 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | TG-2 iHS | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 610k | Clearer screen (+310k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
TG-2 iHS | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will deliver greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Olympus | Ricoh |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Category | Waterproof | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2013-06-28 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 610 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen tech | OLED | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 180 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 4.50 m |
Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 230 gr (0.51 pounds) | 355 gr (0.78 pounds) |
Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photographs | 410 photographs |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | Li-90B | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage media | - | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $380 | $349 |