Clicky

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

Portability
91
Imaging
36
Features
42
Overall
38
Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS front
 
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC front
Portability
85
Imaging
34
Features
44
Overall
38

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs

Olympus TG-2 iHS
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
  • Revealed June 2013
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
  • 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
  • Released March 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview

Below is a complete assessment of the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) is relatively similar but the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") feature different sensor size.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The TG-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is quite a significant gap as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-2 iHS grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 TG-2 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
ReleasedJune 2013March 2010More recent by 40 months

Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Olympus TG-2 iHS

 GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC TG-2 iHS 
Manual focus Very exact focus
Screen resolution920k610kClearer screen (+310k dot)

Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC

 TG-2 iHS GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Screen sizing3"3"Equivalent screen size
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Neither contains Touch friendly screen

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison

For anybody who is looking to lug around your camera often, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got physical measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).

Look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are working with at that moment. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC size comparison

Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 91 and 85 respectively.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC top view buttons comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison

Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor measurements simply by going over a spec sheet. The visual here will help offer you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.

Clearly, both the cameras offer different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS with its tinier sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will deliver greater detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will help you crop pictures a little more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS should have an advantage in sensor tech.

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC sensor size comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Olympus TG-2 iHS
Portrait photography with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
27
has face detect focus
manual focus not available
manual mode not available
no external flash support
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
36
you can focus manually
delivers RAW files
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Photography Glossary

Street Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Street photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Street photography features
61
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
no moving screen
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
65
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lighter than average (355g)
no moving screen
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Sports Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Sports photography info
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sports photography info
40
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has tracking focus
weather sealing
great battery life (350 CIPA)
max fps very slow (5.0 frames per second)
lack of shutter priority mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect auto focus
25
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
doesn't have liveview
max fps low (2.0 frames per second)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
does not have phase detect auto focus
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Travel Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Travel photography features
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Travel photography features
68
great battery life (350 shots)
weather sealing
flash built-in
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
MP count low (12 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly display
60
lighter than average (355g)
has built in flash
really wide (24mm)
sensor resolution low (10 megapixels)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Landscape Comparison

Olympus TG-2 iHS Landscape photography advice
Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Landscape photography advice
46
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
weather sealing
great battery life (350 shots)
manual focus not available
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
manual mode not available
MP count low (12MP)
sensor size is tiny (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
doesn't have Time Lapse mode
47
you can focus manually
really wide (24mm)
screen size is good (3")
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
delivers RAW files
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
doesn't have liveview
sensor resolution low (10MP)
very small sensor size (1/1.7")
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Olympus TG-2 iHS
Vlogging with Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
36
fairly wide (25mm)
very good maximum aperture (f2.0)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not feature selfie friendly display
doesn't have mic port
28
really wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than average (355g)
sluggish maximum aperture (f2.5)
does not feature selfie friendly screen
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing microphone port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
 Olympus Tough TG-2 iHSRicoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
Category Waterproof Advanced Mirrorless
Revealed 2013-06-28 2010-03-18
Body design Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Processor Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/1.7"
Sensor measurements 6.17 x 4.55mm 7.44 x 5.58mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 41.5mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3968 x 2976 3648 x 2736
Highest native ISO 6400 3200
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW photos
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Cross focus points - -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-72mm (3.0x)
Highest aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/2.5-4.4
Macro focus distance 1cm 1cm
Focal length multiplier 5.8 4.8
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 610 thousand dot 920 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch operation
Screen tech OLED -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic (optional)
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4 secs 180 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/2000 secs
Continuous shutter speed 5.0fps 2.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range - 4.50 m
Flash modes - Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 640x480
Video format MPEG-4, H.264 Motion JPEG
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 230 gr (0.51 pounds) 355 gr (0.78 pounds)
Dimensions 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 350 photographs 410 photographs
Battery form Battery Pack Battery Pack
Battery model Li-90B -
Self timer Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) )
Time lapse shooting
Storage media - SD/SDHC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $380 $349