Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
42 Features
39 Overall
40
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Announced May 2017
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Overview
The following is a detailed review of the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-50, both Waterproof digital cameras by competitors Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-50 (16MP) but they use the same exact sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was manufactured 4 years before the WG-50 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before going through a complete comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the WG-50 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-50. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-50 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-50
| TG-2 iHS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-50 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WG-50 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | May 2017 |  | June 2013 | Newer by 47 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-50
| TG-2 iHS | WG-50 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither includes selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither includes Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you should consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") and a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) and the Ricoh WG-50 has proportions of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") along with a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Check out the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Ricoh WG-50 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. Below is the front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS versus the WG-50.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and WG-50 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be tough to visualize the contrast between sensor dimensions purely by going over technical specs. The picture here might give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and WG-50.
As you can tell, both of these cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-50 to offer more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-50 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-50 |
| Category | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2017-05-24 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.7 inches |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lb) | 193 grams (0.43 lb) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 shots | 300 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | - | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $280 |