Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
91 Imaging
43 Features
39 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28-140mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 193g - 123 x 62 x 30mm
- Revealed February 2020
- Later Model is Ricoh WG-80
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Overview
Its time to examine more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70, both Waterproof digital cameras by companies Olympus and Ricoh. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and WG-70 (16MP) but they possess the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 7 years before the WG-70 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-2 iHS matches up versus the WG-70 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Ricoh WG-70. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Ricoh WG-70 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Ricoh WG-70
| TG-2 iHS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-70 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| WG-70 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | February 2020 |  | June 2013 | Newer by 80 months |
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Ricoh WG-70
| TG-2 iHS | WG-70 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither contains selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither contains Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera, you need to take into account its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has got external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-70 has specifications of 123mm x 62mm x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") and a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Take a look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you select at that moment. Following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-2 iHS against the WG-70.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and WG-70 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be hard to visualize the difference between sensor dimensions purely by checking a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and WG-70.
Clearly, both of these cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Ricoh WG-70 to resolve more detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The more aged TG-2 iHS is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Ricoh WG-70 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Ricoh WG-70 |
| Class | Waterproof | Waterproof |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2020-02-04 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 125 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28-140mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.50 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | On, off |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 120p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 60p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM1280 x 720 @ 30p, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Yes (Wireless) |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 193 grams (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 123 x 62 x 30mm (4.8" x 2.4" x 1.2") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | 300 images |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, remote) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | - | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $380 | $280 |