Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
95 Imaging
31 Features
14 Overall
24
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.5" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 38-114mm (F3.5-4.5) lens
- 141g - 93 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched February 2009
- Alternative Name is PL10
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL5, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference between the sensor resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and CL5 (9MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and CL5 (1/2.5") offer different sensor size.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-2 iHS was revealed 4 years later than the CL5 and that is quite a big difference as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung CL5 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short summary of how the TG-2 iHS scores against the CL5 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Samsung CL5. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung CL5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung CL5
| TG-2 iHS | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 | February 2009 | More recent by 53 months | |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
| Screen resolution | 610k | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung CL5 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| CL5 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL5
| TG-2 iHS | CL5 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | No manual focusing | |||
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has outside dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Samsung CL5 has specifications of 93mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") having a weight of 141 grams (0.31 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung CL5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you use at that time. Underneath is a front view size comparison of the TG-2 iHS and the CL5.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and CL5 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's difficult to imagine the difference between sensor measurements simply by looking at specifications. The visual here should provide you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-2 iHS and CL5.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The TG-2 iHS having a bigger sensor is going to make getting shallower DOF less difficult and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will give you more detail because of its extra 3MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots a good deal more aggressively. The younger TG-2 iHS provides an advantage when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraTravel Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung CL5 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung CL5 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung CL5 |
| Alternative name | - | PL10 |
| Class | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2009-02-23 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.5" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 5.744 x 4.308mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 24.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Full resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect focus | ||
| Contract detect focus | ||
| Phase detect focus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 38-114mm (3.0x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-4.5 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 6.3 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 610 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Display tech | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 gr (0.51 lbs) | 141 gr (0.31 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 93 x 60 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 photographs | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $380 | $391 |