Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
68 Imaging
45 Features
36 Overall
41
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Launched June 2013
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 605g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced January 2006
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Overview
Following is a extensive comparison of the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Olympus and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the image resolutions of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and GX-1S (6MP) and the TG-2 iHS (1/2.3") and GX-1S (APS-C) posses different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 7 years after the GX-1S which is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1S being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go right into a full comparison, here is a quick summation of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the GX-1S with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery and Samsung GX-1S Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung GX-1S
| TG-2 iHS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | June 2013 |  | January 2006 | More modern by 91 months |
| Display dimensions | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 610k |  | 210k | Sharper display (+400k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1S over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| GX-1S | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S
| TG-2 iHS | GX-1S | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen | ||
| Touch display |  | Missing Touch display |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS provides external measurements of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-1S has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") along with a weight of 605 grams (1.33 lbs).
See the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung GX-1S in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you use at the time. The following is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the GX-1S.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-2 iHS and GX-1S is 91 and 68 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to picture the contrast in sensor sizes merely by seeing technical specs. The pic below will help provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-2 iHS and GX-1S.
As you have seen, the 2 cameras have different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The TG-2 iHS due to its smaller sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF tougher and the Olympus TG-2 iHS will provide greater detail having its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a bit more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung GX-1S Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-1S | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung GX-1S |
| Type | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Launched | 2013-06-28 | 2006-01-16 |
| Body design | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 2.5" |
| Resolution of screen | 610k dot | 210k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.64x |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 30 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | - |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 pounds) | 605 grams (1.33 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage media | - | SD/MMC card |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Pricing at launch | $380 | $850 |
