Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
94 Imaging
34 Features
33 Overall
33
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Introduced June 2013
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-124mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 187g - 100 x 60 x 19mm
- Launched August 2009
- Other Name is ST550
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Overview
Lets look more closely at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung TL225, former being a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the TL225 (12MP) is fairly similar and both cameras provide the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-2 iHS was introduced 3 years later than the TL225 and that is quite a sizable difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Olympus TG-2 iHS being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL225 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a in-depth comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-2 iHS scores vs the TL225 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Samsung TL225. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Samsung TL225 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Samsung TL225
| TG-2 iHS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | June 2013 |  | August 2009 | More recent by 48 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL225 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| TL225 | TG-2 iHS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display dimensions | 3.5" |  | 3" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 1152k |  | 610k | Clearer display (+542k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Samsung TL225
| TG-2 iHS | TL225 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | No manual focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS features outer dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) whilst the Samsung TL225 has measurements of 100mm x 60mm x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") along with a weight of 187 grams (0.41 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS versus Samsung TL225 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at the time. The following is a front view proportions comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the TL225.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and TL225 is 91 and 94 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its hard to see the difference between sensor measurements merely by reviewing technical specs. The graphic here may give you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and TL225.
As you have seen, both the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same resolution and you can expect similar quality of images but you may want to factor the launch date of the products into consideration. The younger TG-2 iHS is going to have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Samsung TL225 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung TL225 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Samsung TL225 |
| Also referred to as | - | ST550 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2013-06-28 | 2009-08-13 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-124mm (4.6x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3" | 3.5" |
| Screen resolution | 610 thousand dot | 1,152 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 8 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 3.40 m |
| Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow sync, Manual |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 230g (0.51 pounds) | 187g (0.41 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 100 x 60 x 19mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | Li-90B | SLB-07A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | MicroSD/ MicroSDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Launch pricing | $380 | $488 |