Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000
91 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
93 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 230g - 111 x 67 x 29mm
- Released June 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 33-105mm (F3.1-5.6) lens
- 167g - 98 x 61 x 27mm
- Revealed January 2010
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Overview
Its time to take a closer look at the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. The image resolution of the TG-2 iHS (12MP) and the S2000 (10MP) is relatively well matched and they come with the same exact sensor size (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-2 iHS was brought out 3 years after the S2000 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before diving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TG-2 iHS scores versus the S2000 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-2 iHS Gallery & Sony S2000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-2 iHS over the Sony S2000
| TG-2 iHS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2013 |  | January 2010 | Newer by 43 months |
| Screen resolution | 610k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+380k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony S2000 over the Olympus TG-2 iHS
| S2000 | TG-2 iHS |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-2 iHS and Sony S2000
| TG-2 iHS | S2000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | No manual focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen size |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither has Touch screen |
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Physical Comparison
If you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you need to think about its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-2 iHS has physical dimensions of 111mm x 67mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 230 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Sony S2000 has measurements of 98mm x 61mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 167 grams (0.37 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. The following is the front view measurement comparison of the TG-2 iHS vs the S2000.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-2 iHS and S2000 is 91 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it is very hard to imagine the difference between sensor dimensions simply by reading through technical specs. The picture underneath might give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-2 iHS and S2000.
As you have seen, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-2 iHS to give greater detail having its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop photographs far more aggressively. The newer TG-2 iHS should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Olympus TG-2 iHS vs Sony S2000 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-2 iHS | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S2000 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Released | 2013-06-28 | 2010-01-07 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | Bionz |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 3968 x 2976 | 3456 x 2592 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 33-105mm (3.2x) |
| Max aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.1-5.6 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 610k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen technology | OLED | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0fps | 1.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.30 m |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Slow syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 230 grams (0.51 lbs) | 167 grams (0.37 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 111 x 67 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 98 x 61 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | Li-90B | 2 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 and 12 sec, Pet Auto Shutter) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | - | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, optional SD, Internal |
| Card slots | Single | Single |
| Pricing at release | $380 | $225 |