Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
72 Imaging
35 Features
37 Overall
35
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 27-486mm (F2.8-4.4) lens
- 397g - 118 x 76 x 89mm
- Introduced July 2010
- Alternate Name is Lumix DMC-FZ38
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Overview
In this article, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a sizable gap among the resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and FZ35 (12MP) but they enjoy the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe TG-3 was introduced 3 years after the FZ35 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Panasonic FZ35 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go in to a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the TG-3 grades against the FZ35 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Panasonic FZ35 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Panasonic FZ35
| TG-3 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | July 2010 | More modern by 46 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FZ35 over the Olympus TG-3
| FZ35 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Very exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Panasonic FZ35
| TG-3 | FZ35 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you should factor its weight and size. The Olympus TG-3 offers outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic FZ35 has specifications of 118mm x 76mm x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") accompanied by a weight of 397 grams (0.88 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you use at the time. The following is the front view physical size comparison of the TG-3 vs the FZ35.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and FZ35 is 90 and 72 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it can be tough to see the difference in sensor sizes only by viewing specs. The picture underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and FZ35.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same megapixels. You can count on the Olympus TG-3 to result in greater detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop pictures far more aggressively. The fresher TG-3 is going to have an edge in sensor innovation.
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Screen and ViewFinder
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Olympus TG-3 vs Panasonic FZ35 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FZ35 |
| Alternate name | - | Lumix DMC-FZ38 |
| Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2010-07-06 |
| Physical type | Compact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | Venus Engine V |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 27-486mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-4.4 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 60 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 8.50 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | AVCHD Lite, Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 397 gr (0.88 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 118 x 76 x 89mm (4.6" x 3.0" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | - |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 pictures)) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $999 |