Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
97 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Renewed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.5-6.3) lens
- 91g - 87 x 54 x 21mm
- Released June 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Overview
Here, we will be evaluating the Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Olympus and Pentax. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the Efina (14MP) is pretty close and both cameras provide the identical sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-3 was introduced 11 months later than the Efina which means that they are both of a similar age. The two cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Efina being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going straight to a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the TG-3 grades versus the Efina when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Pentax Efina. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Pentax Efina Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Pentax Efina
| TG-3 | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | March 2014 |  | June 2013 | Fresher by 11 months |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax Efina over the Olympus TG-3
| Efina | TG-3 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax Efina
| TG-3 | Efina | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither has Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus TG-3 has external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax Efina has measurements of 87mm x 54mm x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") and a weight of 91 grams (0.20 lbs).
Check the Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Underneath is a front view sizing comparison of the TG-3 and the Efina.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and Efina is 90 and 97 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it's tough to picture the difference in sensor sizing merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual below may provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and Efina.
Clearly, both the cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to provide you with extra detail using its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also make it easier to crop shots way more aggressively. The younger TG-3 provides an edge with regard to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Efina Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax Efina | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax Efina |
| Type | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2013-06-03 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.5-6.3 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 20cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 460k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | QVGA TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1400 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 4.10 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Auto Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced Off |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720, 640 x 480 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Microphone jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 91g (0.20 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 87 x 54 x 21mm (3.4" x 2.1" x 0.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 200 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI109 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SC/SDHC, Internal |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Launch pricing | $350 | $10 |