Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
64 Imaging
57 Features
70 Overall
62
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 51600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/6000s Max Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 646g - 130 x 97 x 71mm
- Launched November 2013
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Overview
Let's look closer at the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax K-500, one being a Waterproof and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by competitors Olympus and Pentax. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the K-500 (16MP) is relatively similar but the TG-3 (1/2.3") and K-500 (APS-C) offer totally different sensor sizing.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe TG-3 was brought out 5 months later than the K-500 so they are both of a similar generation. Both cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax K-500 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting into a thorough comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the TG-3 scores versus the K-500 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Pentax K-500. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Pentax K-500 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Pentax K-500
| TG-3 | K-500 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax K-500 over the Olympus TG-3
| K-500 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focusing | |||
| Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Clearer screen (+461k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax K-500
| TG-3 | K-500 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | March 2014 | November 2013 | Similar generation | |
| Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
| Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen measurement | |
| Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
| Touch screen | Neither contains Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry your camera often, you'll have to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 has got outer measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Pentax K-500 has dimensions of 130mm x 97mm x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") accompanied by a weight of 646 grams (1.42 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax K-500 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you have during that time. Here is a front view dimension comparison of the TG-3 compared to the K-500.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and K-500 is 90 and 64 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing purely by reading technical specs. The visual underneath may offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the TG-3 and K-500.
As you have seen, the two cameras feature the identical MP albeit not the same sensor sizing. The TG-3 offers the tinier sensor which will make obtaining shallower depth of field trickier.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax K-500 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax K-500 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax K-500 |
| Category | Waterproof | Entry-Level DSLR |
| Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2013-11-27 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | PRIME M |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 51600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 11 |
| Cross type focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax KAF2 |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 151 |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Display resolution | 460 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | TFT LCD monitor with brightness/color adjustment and AR coating |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (pentaprism) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.61x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/6000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 6.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Sync, Slow Sync+Redeye, Trailing Curtain Sync, Wireless |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | - | 1/180s |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60,50,30,25,24 fps), 640 x 424 (30,25,24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | Optional |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 lb) | 646 grams (1.42 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 130 x 97 x 71mm (5.1" x 3.8" x 2.8") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | 79 |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.7 |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 13.1 |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | 1087 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photographs | 710 photographs |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | AA |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes ( 2 or 12 seconds) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | One | One |
| Retail cost | $350 | $600 |