Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-3 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was introduced 4 months before the Q-S1 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-3 matches up vs the Q-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Pentax Q-S1
| TG-3 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-3
| Q-S1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax Q-S1
| TG-3 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | August 2014 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 provides outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 and the Q-S1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and Q-S1 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and Q-S1.
As you can see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus TG-3 will give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2014-08-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 250 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $250 |