Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
92 Imaging
37 Features
54 Overall
43
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Replacement is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Revealed August 2014
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Let's look more closely at the Olympus TG-3 versus Pentax Q-S1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor sizing.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-3 was introduced 4 months before the Q-S1 which means that they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before delving right into a detailed comparison, here is a brief synopsis of how the TG-3 matches up vs the Q-S1 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Pentax Q-S1
| TG-3 | Q-S1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-3
| Q-S1 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Pentax Q-S1
| TG-3 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | August 2014 | Similar age |
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen measurement |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither provides selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither provides Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-3 provides outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") and a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Pentax Q-S1 has proportions of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") and a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 versus Pentax Q-S1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select at the time. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 and the Q-S1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and Q-S1 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be hard to envision the contrast between sensor dimensions just by reading through a spec sheet. The picture below will help provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizing in the TG-3 and Q-S1.
As you can see, the two cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 with its tinier sensor will make achieving bokeh tougher and the Olympus TG-3 will give you more detail using its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures way more aggressively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus TG-3 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Class | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2014-08-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
| Number of lenses | - | 8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Resolution of display | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 203g (0.45 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 shots | 250 shots |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $250 |