Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
69 Imaging
44 Features
36 Overall
40
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Introduced March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 6MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- No Video
- Pentax KAF Mount
- 570g - 125 x 93 x 66mm
- Announced February 2006
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Overview
Its time to look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-1L, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There exists a sizable gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and GX-1L (6MP) and the TG-3 (1/2.3") and GX-1L (APS-C) possess different sensor sizes.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was revealed 8 years after the GX-1L which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung GX-1L being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a concise synopsis of how the TG-3 matches up vs the GX-1L with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung GX-1L. The full galleries are provided at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung GX-1L Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung GX-1L
| TG-3 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 |  | February 2006 | Newer by 99 months |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 210k | Clearer screen (+250k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung GX-1L over the Olympus TG-3
| GX-1L | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-1L
| TG-3 | GX-1L | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Neither features Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 enjoys external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Samsung GX-1L has dimensions of 125mm x 93mm x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") and a weight of 570 grams (1.26 lbs).
Contrast the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung GX-1L in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-3 compared to the GX-1L.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and GX-1L is 90 and 69 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is tough to visualize the gap between sensor dimensions only by reviewing technical specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and GX-1L.
As you can tell, both of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The TG-3 using its tinier sensor is going to make shooting shallow DOF harder and the Olympus TG-3 will deliver more detail because of its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will let you crop shots far more aggressively. The more modern TG-3 provides a benefit in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banVlogging Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung GX-1L Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung GX-1L | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung GX-1L |
| Class | Waterproof | Advanced DSLR |
| Introduced | 2014-03-31 | 2006-02-24 |
| Physical type | Compact | Mid-size SLR |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 369.0mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 6 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 3:2 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3008 x 2008 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 5 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | Pentax KAF |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 151 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 2.5 inches |
| Resolution of display | 460k dots | 210k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
| Viewfinder coverage | - | 96 percent |
| Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.57x |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 3.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.50 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye reduction |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash synchronize | - | 1/180 secs |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | - |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 570 gr (1.26 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 125 x 93 x 66mm (4.9" x 3.7" x 2.6") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 photos | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | 4 x AA |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/MMC card |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail price | $350 | $0 |