Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
99 Imaging
37 Features
25 Overall
32
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed March 2014
- New Model is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 93 x 54 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2011
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Overview
The following is a detailed overview of the Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100, former is a Waterproof while the other is a Ultracompact by companies Olympus and Samsung. The image resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the SH100 (14MP) is very comparable and they enjoy the same exact sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe TG-3 was revealed 3 years after the SH100 which is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Olympus TG-3 being a Compact camera and the Samsung SH100 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a more detailed comparison, below is a short overview of how the TG-3 matches up against the SH100 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Samsung SH100. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Samsung SH100 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung SH100
| TG-3 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | March 2014 |  | January 2011 | Newer by 40 months |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper display (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung SH100 over the Olympus TG-3
| SH100 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Touch friendly display |  | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung SH100
| TG-3 | SH100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | Lack of manual focus | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent display sizing |
| Selfie screen |  | Missing selfie screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Physical Comparison
When you are aiming to travel with your camera, you need to factor its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 comes with external dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Samsung SH100 has sizing of 93mm x 54mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Bear in mind, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are utilising at that time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the TG-3 and the SH100.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-3 and SH100 is 90 and 99 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be hard to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture below should give you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and SH100.
As you can see, the two cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing but different resolution. You can expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to provide more detail because of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos far more aggressively. The more recent TG-3 provides a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung SH100 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung SH100 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung SH100 |
| Category | Waterproof | Ultracompact |
| Revealed | 2014-03-31 | 2011-01-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4230 x 3240 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
| Min native ISO | 100 | - |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | () |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 460 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | - |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 93 x 54 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 images | - |
| Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | - |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at release | $350 | $200 |
