Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F
90 Imaging
39 Features
46 Overall
41
93 Imaging
36 Features
42 Overall
38
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched March 2014
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-432mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 188g - 107 x 61 x 23mm
- Announced January 2012
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Overview
Lets take a closer look at the Olympus TG-3 versus Samsung WB150F, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Samsung. The resolution of the TG-3 (16MP) and the WB150F (14MP) is very similar and both cameras posses the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Mastering Nature Photography with a Digital Microscope CameraThe TG-3 was brought out 2 years after the WB150F which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before delving right into a in-depth comparison, here is a concise introduction of how the TG-3 grades vs the WB150F with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-3 and Samsung WB150F. The entire galleries are available at Olympus TG-3 Gallery and Samsung WB150F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Samsung WB150F
| TG-3 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | March 2014 | January 2012 | More modern by 28 months |
Reasons to pick Samsung WB150F over the Olympus TG-3
| WB150F | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | More accurate focusing |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Samsung WB150F
| TG-3 | WB150F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display size | |
| Display resolution | 460k | 460k | Identical display resolution | |
| Selfie screen | Neither includes selfie screen | |||
| Touch friendly display | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Physical Comparison
If you are intending to carry around your camera, you're going to have to think about its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-3 features exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Samsung WB150F has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 188 grams (0.41 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-3 versus Samsung WB150F in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you choose at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 vs the WB150F.

Taking into account size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-3 and WB150F is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Sensor Comparison
Generally, its tough to picture the contrast between sensor sizes merely by reading specs. The pic here should offer you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and WB150F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras provide the same sensor dimensions but different resolution. You should expect to see the Olympus TG-3 to offer you more detail having its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop images more aggressively. The newer TG-3 should have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Screen and ViewFinder
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
Olympus TG-3 vs Samsung WB150F Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung WB150F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Samsung WB150F |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2014-03-31 | 2012-01-09 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-432mm (18.0x) |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Display technology | TFT-LCD | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 16 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 10.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 3.50 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lb) | 188 gr (0.41 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 107 x 61 x 23mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Pricing at release | $350 | $230 |