Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220
90 Imaging
40 Features
46 Overall
42
95 Imaging
34 Features
17 Overall
27
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced March 2014
- Successor is Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 30-120mm (F2.8-7.1) lens
- 147g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced January 2009
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Olympus and Sony. There exists a sizable gap among the image resolutions of the TG-3 (16MP) and W220 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TG-3 was introduced 5 years later than the W220 and that is a fairly significant difference as far as camera technology is concerned. The two cameras come with the identical body type (Compact).
Before delving in to a full comparison, below is a short summation of how the TG-3 matches up vs the W220 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-3 & Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220. The whole galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-3 Gallery & Sony W220 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-3 over the Sony W220
| TG-3 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | March 2014 |  | January 2009 | More recent by 64 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Crisper screen (+230k dot) |
Reasons to pick Sony W220 over the Olympus TG-3
| W220 | TG-3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More precise focus |
Common features in the Olympus TG-3 and Sony W220
| TG-3 | W220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Missing Touch screen |
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is planning to lug around your camera frequently, you have to think about its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-3 offers exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Sony W220 has sizing of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 147 grams (0.32 lbs).
Compare the Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you have during that time. Following is the front view dimensions comparison of the TG-3 and the W220.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-3 and W220 is 90 and 95 respectively.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Sensor Comparison
Typically, it can be hard to see the contrast in sensor measurements just by seeing specifications. The graphic here will provide you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-3 and W220.
To sum up, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You can expect the Olympus TG-3 to produce extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will let you crop shots somewhat more aggressively. The newer TG-3 will have an edge in sensor tech.
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Screen and ViewFinder
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-3 vs Sony W220 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Sony |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-3 | Sony Cyber-shot DSC-W220 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2014-03-31 | 2009-01-08 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 30-120mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8-7.1 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 5cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Screen tech | TFT-LCD | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 1 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/1600 secs |
| Continuous shooting rate | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 7.10 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, Flash On, Slow Syncro, Red-eye, Flash Off |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (8 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 147 gr (0.32 lbs) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 330 pictures | - |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | Memory Stick Duo/Pro Duo, Internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $350 | $160 |