Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44


94 Imaging
37 Features
38 Overall
37
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Replacement is Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
- Introduced February 2011
- Previous Model is Olympus VR-320

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330: An In-Depth Camera Comparison for Every Photographer’s Journey
Choosing the right camera can often feel like navigating a maze, with a myriad of technical specs and marketing buzzwords clouding your vision. As seasoned reviewers with thousands of hours testing cameras, we’re here to cut through the noise and give you a detailed, experience-backed comparison of two Olympus compacts: the rugged Olympus Tough TG-4 and the versatile Olympus VR-330. Whether you’re an adventurous landscape photographer, a casual traveller, or someone seeking an affordable superzoom, this assessment will clear the haze and help you find the ideal fit.
We’ll explore everything from sensor technology and ergonomics to genre-specific performance, peppered with practical insights gained from hands-on testing. Let’s dive in.
First Impressions and Handling: Designed for Different Missions
Though both cameras fall under compact bodies, their DNA is markedly different - one is built for durability and extreme conditions; the other for zoom versatility and portability.
Feature | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Dimensions (mm) | 112 x 66 x 31 | 101 x 58 x 29 |
Weight (g) | 247 | 158 |
Build | Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof | Standard compact |
Weather Sealing | Yes (freeze and crushproof too) | No |
Ergonomics | Chunkier with pronounced grip | Slimmer, pocket-friendly |
TG-4: Handling the TG-4, you immediately sense its ruggedness. Its chunky grip fits well in the hand, and the durable housing inspires confidence for outdoor activities like hiking, diving, or snow adventures. Its slightly larger size and weight come with the reassurance of toughness.
VR-330: The VR-330 is noticeably lighter and more compact, designed for everyday carry and travel. Without weather sealing, it feels less like a tool for harsh environments and more for versatile shooting where discretion and portability matter.
Our Take: Your choice here should align with lifestyle. If you crave durability and worry about the elements, the TG-4 has you covered. If lightness and travel ease top your priority list, the VR-330 excels.
Control Layout & User Interface: Classic Olympus Simplicity vs Basic Convenience
Both cameras feature fixed 3-inch LCD screens at 460k dots resolution with no electronic viewfinder, making LCD usability crucial.
-
TG-4: Offers intuitive physical control dials - aperture priority mode is available, letting you creatively control depth of field. Buttons provide quick access to manual focus, exposure, and stabilization, backed by Olympus’ TruePic VII image processor smooth interface.
-
VR-330: Prioritizes simplicity with minimal controls and no manual aperture or shutter priority modes. The TruePic III processor handles basic operations well but with fewer creative options. No manual focus or advanced exposure modes limit control.
Practical Insight: If you’re serious about understanding and influencing exposure or experimenting with depth of field, TG-4’s interface is your ally. The VR-330 targets snapshooters or beginners who prefer point-and-shoot ease.
Sensor Technology and Image Quality: How MegaPixels and Sensor Types Matter
The heart of any camera is its sensor, directly impacting image quality, noise handling, dynamic range, and color fidelity.
Specification | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Sensor Size | 1/2.3” BSI CMOS | 1/2.3” CCD |
Sensor Dimensions (mm) | 6.17 x 4.55 | 6.17 x 4.55 |
Megapixels | 16 MP | 14 MP |
Max ISO Sensitivity | 6400 | 1600 |
Raw Support | Yes | No |
Antialiasing Filter | Yes | Yes |
Expert Notes:
- BSI-CMOS in the TG-4 offers better light-gathering efficiency compared to the older CCD in the VR-330.
- Higher max ISO (6400 vs 1600) in TG-4 indicates better potential for low-light shooting.
- Raw format availability on TG-4 opens doors to advanced post-processing with improved dynamic range control.
- Despite similar physical sensor sizes, the TG-4’s newer sensor tech provides a notable edge in noise control and image clarity at higher ISO.
Real World Testing: In well-lit conditions, both cameras produce solid JPEG images; however, the TG-4 shines in shadows and dim settings with cleaner noise performance. The VR-330 tends to struggle beyond ISO 400–800, showing more grain and color shifts.
Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Reach vs Brightness
Specification | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Lens Focal Length | 25-100 mm (4x zoom) | 24-300 mm (12.5x zoom) |
Max Aperture Range | f/2.0 - f/4.9 | f/3.0 - f/5.9 |
Macro Focusing Distance | 1 cm | 1 cm |
Optical Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Sensor-shift |
The TG-4’s bright f/2 aperture at the wide end allows better control over depth of field and improved low-light performance. The more limited zoom range (4x) favors quality over reach.
The VR-330's superzoom lens reaches far into telephoto territory with a 12.5x range, enabling detailed wildlife or distant subject shots. However, its smaller maximum aperture reduces performance in dim conditions and limits shallow depth-of-field effects.
In Practice: For portraits and creative blurring, TG-4’s wider aperture will please you. For travel and wildlife where zoom is more important, the VR-330 grants flexibility with longer reach albeit with compromises in light sensitivity.
Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Action Versus Precision
Feature | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Focus Points | 25 (contrast detection) | Multiple (unknown no.) |
Autofocus Type | Contrast detection | Contrast detection |
Continuous Shooting | 5 fps | Not specified |
Face Detection | Yes | Yes |
Animal Eye Detection | No | No |
AF Modes | Single, Continuous, Tracking | Single, Tracking |
The TG-4 features contrast-detect autofocus with face detection and continuous focus modes at 5 frames per second - respectable for tackling moving subjects in adventures or sports scenarios.
The VR-330 lacks continuous shooting detail and manual focus, presenting a more basic AF system geared towards casual photography. Its autofocus works well in static or slow-moving scenes.
Hands-On Analysis: When following a playful pet or capturing kids in action, TG-4’s faster continuous shooting and reliable face tracking won’t let you down. The VR-330 is better for calm moments or travel snapshots.
Durability and Environmental Resistance: Weatherproof vs No Protection
- TG-4: Waterproof down to 15 meters, crushproof to 100 kgf, shockproof from 2.1 m drops, freezeproof to -10°C, and dustproof.
- VR-330: No environmental sealing, susceptible to moisture and dust.
If extreme outdoor usage - underwater photography, mountain hiking, skiing - piques your interest, the TG-4 is purpose-built to endure and document your adventures.
The VR-330 is ideal for careful indoor/outdoor use without exposure to extremes.
Battery Life and Storage: Power for Extended Sessions
Feature | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Battery Model | LI-92B | LI-42B |
Battery Life (CIPA) | Approx. 380 shots | Not specified |
Storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal | SD, SDHC |
TG-4’s battery life is decent for a rugged compact, designed for longer sessions when you might not have immediate charging access. The VR-330’s smaller body size likely limits battery capacity, with user feedback suggesting more frequent recharging if shooting intensively.
Keeping extra batteries and high-speed SD cards is wise for both, but you get a touch more endurance with TG-4.
Connectivity and Extras: Modern Convenience vs Basic
Feature | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Wifi | Built-In | None |
GPS | Built-In | No |
HDMI Port | Yes | Yes |
USB | USB 2.0 | USB 2.0 |
Microphone/Headphone | No | No |
Timelapse | Yes | No |
The TG-4 impresses with built-in WiFi and GPS, enabling easy location tagging and direct photo sharing - a boon for travel photographers blogging or creating social content on the move.
The VR-330 remains more traditional with no wireless features.
Video Performance: Full HD vs Basic HD
Specification | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Max Video Resolution | 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps | 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps |
Video Formats | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Microphone Input | No | No |
Stabilization | Sensor-shift | Sensor-shift |
The TG-4 captures smooth Full HD video, suitable for casual vlogging or documenting experiences with good image quality and stabilization.
The VR-330’s lower 720p max resolution and dated Motion JPEG compression make it less suited for video-centric creators.
Specialty Photography: How They Excel by Genre
We evaluated both cameras across main photographic disciplines, considering relevant strengths backed by testing.
Photography Type | Olympus TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
---|---|---|
Portrait | Crisp skin tones, natural bokeh, face detect | Adequate in good light, limited control |
Landscape | Great dynamic range, rugged for all weathers | Good for easy landscapes, no weatherproofing |
Wildlife | Good AF tracking, 5 fps burst, telephoto limited | Long zoom lens helps distant shots |
Sports | Decent tracking/speed for action | Limited continuous shooting |
Street | Bulkier but weather resistant | Compact, discreet, great zoom |
Macro | 1cm macro, excellent close-ups | Similar macro ability, less versatile |
Night/Astro | Higher ISO, better low noise | Limited ISO, noise more visible |
Video | Full HD, stabilization | HD only, limited codec |
Travel | Rugged, GPS, WiFi perfect for explorers | Lightweight, huge zoom, compact |
Professional Use | Raw shooting, good workflow integration | Basic JPEG, fewer pro features |
Notice the TG-4’s impressive macro detail and rich colors in low light compared to the VR-330’s softer zoomed-in shots.
Summary Scores and Recommendations
After extensive evaluation, here is a score-based performance overview:
Should You Choose the Olympus TG-4?
The TG-4 is a specialized tool for creative photographers who want:
- A tough, no-nonsense camera that thrives in extreme environments
- Higher image quality via BSI-CMOS sensor and raw capability
- Creative control with aperture priority, manual focus, and focus bracketing
- Better video and wireless sharing features
- A versatile companion for macro, night, landscape, and action photography
If you spend a lot of time outdoors, dive/snorkel, hike, or simply want a compact that won’t shy from tough conditions, the TG-4 is worth the investment.
When the Olympus VR-330 Makes Sense
The VR-330 caters well to enthusiasts who:
- Prioritize a long zoom range (12.5x optical) in a lightweight package
- Prefer point-and-shoot simplicity over manual controls
- Value a budget-friendly camera for travel, family events, or casual use
- Want decent image quality in good light without raw processing
Although lacking rugged build and advanced specs, the VR-330 is a practical superzoom compact if you want reach and portability without breaking the bank.
Final Thoughts: Matching Cameras to Your Vision
When we put the Olympus TG-4 and VR-330 side by side, it’s clear they address distinct user profiles:
- TG-4: Adventure-friendly, creative enthusiasts who need durability, manual control, and superior image/video capabilities.
- VR-330: Casual photographers who want good zoom reach in a simple, lightweight camera.
Of course, new tech advances might tempt you towards recent models, but both cameras stand as solid options in their niches.
Whichever path you choose, our advice is to test these cameras firsthand - feel the grip, try the menus, and shoot a few sample frames to see which aligns with your creative style and practical needs.
Check Out These Accessories
For the TG-4, consider rugged cases, extra batteries, and underwater housing extensions to expand your creative possibilities.
For the VR-330, spare memory cards and a protective carrying case will help keep your superzoom ready for spontaneous shooting.
Happy shooting, and may your next camera be your perfect creative partner!
For deeper technical comparison and hands-on sample galleries, refer to our online review archives and test reports.
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications
Olympus Tough TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Olympus | Olympus |
Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Olympus VR-330 |
Class | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Announced | 2015-04-13 | 2011-02-08 |
Body design | Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | TruePic VII | TruePic III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 25 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-300mm (12.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.0-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.70 m |
Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 247g (0.54 pounds) | 158g (0.35 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 380 photographs | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | LI-92B | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $379 | $220 |