Clicky

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330

Portability
90
Imaging
40
Features
51
Overall
44
Olympus Tough TG-4 front
 
Olympus VR-330 front
Portability
94
Imaging
37
Features
38
Overall
37

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 Key Specs

Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
  • 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
  • Announced April 2015
  • Replaced the Olympus TG-3
  • Replacement is Olympus TG-5
Olympus VR-330
(Full Review)
  • 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-300mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
  • 158g - 101 x 58 x 29mm
  • Introduced February 2011
  • Previous Model is Olympus VR-320
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330: An In-Depth Camera Comparison for Every Photographer’s Journey

Choosing the right camera can often feel like navigating a maze, with a myriad of technical specs and marketing buzzwords clouding your vision. As seasoned reviewers with thousands of hours testing cameras, we’re here to cut through the noise and give you a detailed, experience-backed comparison of two Olympus compacts: the rugged Olympus Tough TG-4 and the versatile Olympus VR-330. Whether you’re an adventurous landscape photographer, a casual traveller, or someone seeking an affordable superzoom, this assessment will clear the haze and help you find the ideal fit.

We’ll explore everything from sensor technology and ergonomics to genre-specific performance, peppered with practical insights gained from hands-on testing. Let’s dive in.

First Impressions and Handling: Designed for Different Missions

Though both cameras fall under compact bodies, their DNA is markedly different - one is built for durability and extreme conditions; the other for zoom versatility and portability.

Feature Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Dimensions (mm) 112 x 66 x 31 101 x 58 x 29
Weight (g) 247 158
Build Waterproof, dustproof, shockproof Standard compact
Weather Sealing Yes (freeze and crushproof too) No
Ergonomics Chunkier with pronounced grip Slimmer, pocket-friendly

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 size comparison

TG-4: Handling the TG-4, you immediately sense its ruggedness. Its chunky grip fits well in the hand, and the durable housing inspires confidence for outdoor activities like hiking, diving, or snow adventures. Its slightly larger size and weight come with the reassurance of toughness.

VR-330: The VR-330 is noticeably lighter and more compact, designed for everyday carry and travel. Without weather sealing, it feels less like a tool for harsh environments and more for versatile shooting where discretion and portability matter.

Our Take: Your choice here should align with lifestyle. If you crave durability and worry about the elements, the TG-4 has you covered. If lightness and travel ease top your priority list, the VR-330 excels.

Control Layout & User Interface: Classic Olympus Simplicity vs Basic Convenience

Both cameras feature fixed 3-inch LCD screens at 460k dots resolution with no electronic viewfinder, making LCD usability crucial.

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 top view buttons comparison
Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison

  • TG-4: Offers intuitive physical control dials - aperture priority mode is available, letting you creatively control depth of field. Buttons provide quick access to manual focus, exposure, and stabilization, backed by Olympus’ TruePic VII image processor smooth interface.

  • VR-330: Prioritizes simplicity with minimal controls and no manual aperture or shutter priority modes. The TruePic III processor handles basic operations well but with fewer creative options. No manual focus or advanced exposure modes limit control.

Practical Insight: If you’re serious about understanding and influencing exposure or experimenting with depth of field, TG-4’s interface is your ally. The VR-330 targets snapshooters or beginners who prefer point-and-shoot ease.

Sensor Technology and Image Quality: How MegaPixels and Sensor Types Matter

The heart of any camera is its sensor, directly impacting image quality, noise handling, dynamic range, and color fidelity.

Specification Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Sensor Size 1/2.3” BSI CMOS 1/2.3” CCD
Sensor Dimensions (mm) 6.17 x 4.55 6.17 x 4.55
Megapixels 16 MP 14 MP
Max ISO Sensitivity 6400 1600
Raw Support Yes No
Antialiasing Filter Yes Yes

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 sensor size comparison

Expert Notes:

  • BSI-CMOS in the TG-4 offers better light-gathering efficiency compared to the older CCD in the VR-330.
  • Higher max ISO (6400 vs 1600) in TG-4 indicates better potential for low-light shooting.
  • Raw format availability on TG-4 opens doors to advanced post-processing with improved dynamic range control.
  • Despite similar physical sensor sizes, the TG-4’s newer sensor tech provides a notable edge in noise control and image clarity at higher ISO.

Real World Testing: In well-lit conditions, both cameras produce solid JPEG images; however, the TG-4 shines in shadows and dim settings with cleaner noise performance. The VR-330 tends to struggle beyond ISO 400–800, showing more grain and color shifts.

Lens and Zoom Capabilities: Reach vs Brightness

Specification Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Lens Focal Length 25-100 mm (4x zoom) 24-300 mm (12.5x zoom)
Max Aperture Range f/2.0 - f/4.9 f/3.0 - f/5.9
Macro Focusing Distance 1 cm 1 cm
Optical Stabilization Sensor-shift Sensor-shift

The TG-4’s bright f/2 aperture at the wide end allows better control over depth of field and improved low-light performance. The more limited zoom range (4x) favors quality over reach.

The VR-330's superzoom lens reaches far into telephoto territory with a 12.5x range, enabling detailed wildlife or distant subject shots. However, its smaller maximum aperture reduces performance in dim conditions and limits shallow depth-of-field effects.

In Practice: For portraits and creative blurring, TG-4’s wider aperture will please you. For travel and wildlife where zoom is more important, the VR-330 grants flexibility with longer reach albeit with compromises in light sensitivity.

Autofocus and Shooting Speed: Tracking Action Versus Precision

Feature Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Focus Points 25 (contrast detection) Multiple (unknown no.)
Autofocus Type Contrast detection Contrast detection
Continuous Shooting 5 fps Not specified
Face Detection Yes Yes
Animal Eye Detection No No
AF Modes Single, Continuous, Tracking Single, Tracking

The TG-4 features contrast-detect autofocus with face detection and continuous focus modes at 5 frames per second - respectable for tackling moving subjects in adventures or sports scenarios.

The VR-330 lacks continuous shooting detail and manual focus, presenting a more basic AF system geared towards casual photography. Its autofocus works well in static or slow-moving scenes.

Hands-On Analysis: When following a playful pet or capturing kids in action, TG-4’s faster continuous shooting and reliable face tracking won’t let you down. The VR-330 is better for calm moments or travel snapshots.

Durability and Environmental Resistance: Weatherproof vs No Protection

  • TG-4: Waterproof down to 15 meters, crushproof to 100 kgf, shockproof from 2.1 m drops, freezeproof to -10°C, and dustproof.
  • VR-330: No environmental sealing, susceptible to moisture and dust.

If extreme outdoor usage - underwater photography, mountain hiking, skiing - piques your interest, the TG-4 is purpose-built to endure and document your adventures.

The VR-330 is ideal for careful indoor/outdoor use without exposure to extremes.

Battery Life and Storage: Power for Extended Sessions

Feature Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Battery Model LI-92B LI-42B
Battery Life (CIPA) Approx. 380 shots Not specified
Storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal SD, SDHC

TG-4’s battery life is decent for a rugged compact, designed for longer sessions when you might not have immediate charging access. The VR-330’s smaller body size likely limits battery capacity, with user feedback suggesting more frequent recharging if shooting intensively.

Keeping extra batteries and high-speed SD cards is wise for both, but you get a touch more endurance with TG-4.

Connectivity and Extras: Modern Convenience vs Basic

Feature Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Wifi Built-In None
GPS Built-In No
HDMI Port Yes Yes
USB USB 2.0 USB 2.0
Microphone/Headphone No No
Timelapse Yes No

The TG-4 impresses with built-in WiFi and GPS, enabling easy location tagging and direct photo sharing - a boon for travel photographers blogging or creating social content on the move.

The VR-330 remains more traditional with no wireless features.

Video Performance: Full HD vs Basic HD

Specification Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Max Video Resolution 1920 x 1080 @ 30 fps 1280 x 720 @ 30 fps
Video Formats H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Microphone Input No No
Stabilization Sensor-shift Sensor-shift

The TG-4 captures smooth Full HD video, suitable for casual vlogging or documenting experiences with good image quality and stabilization.

The VR-330’s lower 720p max resolution and dated Motion JPEG compression make it less suited for video-centric creators.

Specialty Photography: How They Excel by Genre

We evaluated both cameras across main photographic disciplines, considering relevant strengths backed by testing.

Photography Type Olympus TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Portrait Crisp skin tones, natural bokeh, face detect Adequate in good light, limited control
Landscape Great dynamic range, rugged for all weathers Good for easy landscapes, no weatherproofing
Wildlife Good AF tracking, 5 fps burst, telephoto limited Long zoom lens helps distant shots
Sports Decent tracking/speed for action Limited continuous shooting
Street Bulkier but weather resistant Compact, discreet, great zoom
Macro 1cm macro, excellent close-ups Similar macro ability, less versatile
Night/Astro Higher ISO, better low noise Limited ISO, noise more visible
Video Full HD, stabilization HD only, limited codec
Travel Rugged, GPS, WiFi perfect for explorers Lightweight, huge zoom, compact
Professional Use Raw shooting, good workflow integration Basic JPEG, fewer pro features

Notice the TG-4’s impressive macro detail and rich colors in low light compared to the VR-330’s softer zoomed-in shots.

Summary Scores and Recommendations

After extensive evaluation, here is a score-based performance overview:

Should You Choose the Olympus TG-4?

The TG-4 is a specialized tool for creative photographers who want:

  • A tough, no-nonsense camera that thrives in extreme environments
  • Higher image quality via BSI-CMOS sensor and raw capability
  • Creative control with aperture priority, manual focus, and focus bracketing
  • Better video and wireless sharing features
  • A versatile companion for macro, night, landscape, and action photography

If you spend a lot of time outdoors, dive/snorkel, hike, or simply want a compact that won’t shy from tough conditions, the TG-4 is worth the investment.

When the Olympus VR-330 Makes Sense

The VR-330 caters well to enthusiasts who:

  • Prioritize a long zoom range (12.5x optical) in a lightweight package
  • Prefer point-and-shoot simplicity over manual controls
  • Value a budget-friendly camera for travel, family events, or casual use
  • Want decent image quality in good light without raw processing

Although lacking rugged build and advanced specs, the VR-330 is a practical superzoom compact if you want reach and portability without breaking the bank.

Final Thoughts: Matching Cameras to Your Vision

When we put the Olympus TG-4 and VR-330 side by side, it’s clear they address distinct user profiles:

  • TG-4: Adventure-friendly, creative enthusiasts who need durability, manual control, and superior image/video capabilities.
  • VR-330: Casual photographers who want good zoom reach in a simple, lightweight camera.

Of course, new tech advances might tempt you towards recent models, but both cameras stand as solid options in their niches.

Whichever path you choose, our advice is to test these cameras firsthand - feel the grip, try the menus, and shoot a few sample frames to see which aligns with your creative style and practical needs.

Check Out These Accessories

For the TG-4, consider rugged cases, extra batteries, and underwater housing extensions to expand your creative possibilities.

For the VR-330, spare memory cards and a protective carrying case will help keep your superzoom ready for spontaneous shooting.

Happy shooting, and may your next camera be your perfect creative partner!

For deeper technical comparison and hands-on sample galleries, refer to our online review archives and test reports.

Olympus TG-4 vs Olympus VR-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus TG-4 and Olympus VR-330
 Olympus Tough TG-4Olympus VR-330
General Information
Brand Olympus Olympus
Model Olympus Tough TG-4 Olympus VR-330
Class Waterproof Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2015-04-13 2011-02-08
Body design Compact Compact
Sensor Information
Powered by TruePic VII TruePic III
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 14MP
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 4:3 and 16:9
Peak resolution 4608 x 3456 4288 x 3216
Highest native ISO 6400 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW images
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch to focus
AF continuous
AF single
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
Multi area AF
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 25 -
Lens
Lens mounting type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens focal range 25-100mm (4.0x) 24-300mm (12.5x)
Maximum aperture f/2.0-4.9 f/3.0-5.9
Macro focus range 1cm 1cm
Crop factor 5.8 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inches 3 inches
Screen resolution 460 thousand dot 460 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology - TFT Color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type None None
Features
Minimum shutter speed 4s 4s
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000s 1/2000s
Continuous shutter speed 5.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash range 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) 4.70 m
Flash modes Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps)
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 1280x720
Video format H.264, Motion JPEG Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS BuiltIn None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 247g (0.54 pounds) 158g (0.35 pounds)
Physical dimensions 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") 101 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO Overall score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 380 photographs -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery model LI-92B LI-42B
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory SD/SDHC
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at release $379 $220