Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15
90 Imaging
40 Features
51 Overall
44
92 Imaging
36 Features
37 Overall
36
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Announced April 2015
- Older Model is Olympus TG-3
- Refreshed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-384mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 208g - 105 x 58 x 33mm
- Released June 2012
- Also referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ25
- Updated by Panasonic ZS20
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic ZS15, one is a Waterproof and the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Panasonic. There exists a huge gap between the sensor resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and ZS15 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banThe TG-4 was launched 2 years after the ZS15 which is quite a significant gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a thorough comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the TG-4 grades against the ZS15 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15. The complete galleries are viewable at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Panasonic ZS15 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic ZS15
| TG-4 | ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | June 2012 | More modern by 34 months |
| Manually focus |  | More accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS15 over the Olympus TG-4
| ZS15 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic ZS15
| TG-4 | ZS15 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 3" | Equal screen sizing |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | Equal screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch screen |  | Lacking Touch screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to carry around your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus TG-4 features outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Panasonic ZS15 has dimensions of 105mm x 58mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 208 grams (0.46 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic ZS15 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you are employing at the time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the TG-4 compared to the ZS15.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and ZS15 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very difficult to imagine the contrast between sensor sizes simply by going over specifications. The pic here may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the TG-4 and ZS15.
To sum up, the two cameras provide the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You should expect the Olympus TG-4 to deliver greater detail utilizing its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop pictures more aggressively. The more modern TG-4 should have an edge in sensor technology.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS15 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS15 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ25 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Announced | 2015-04-13 | 2012-06-29 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW photos | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-384mm (16.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 460 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch friendly | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 4 secs | 15 secs |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.40 m |
| Flash options | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 lbs) | 208 gr (0.46 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch cost | $379 | $279 |