Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25
Portability
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Portability
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
93 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Key Specs
Olympus TG-4
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Newer Model is Olympus TG-5
Panasonic ZS25
(Full Review)
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-480mm (F3.3-6.4) lens
- 193g - 105 x 59 x 28mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-TZ35
- Old Model is Panasonic ZS20
- Renewed by Panasonic ZS30
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Overview
In this article, we will be reviewing the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic ZS25, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Olympus and Panasonic. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the ZS25 (16MP) is pretty close and they possess the same exact sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe TG-4 was announced 2 years after the ZS25 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Compact).
Before getting in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the TG-4 matches up versus the ZS25 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25. The whole galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Panasonic ZS25 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Panasonic ZS25
| TG-4 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | April 2015 |  | January 2013 | More modern by 28 months |
| Focus manually |  | Very precise focus |
Reasons to pick Panasonic ZS25 over the Olympus TG-4
| ZS25 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Panasonic ZS25
| TG-4 | ZS25 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen sizing | 3" |  | 3" | Equivalent screen dimensions |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither offers selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Lacking Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor in its weight and volume. The Olympus TG-4 offers exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) and the Panasonic ZS25 has sizing of 105mm x 59mm x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 193 grams (0.43 lbs).
Examine the Olympus TG-4 versus Panasonic ZS25 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have chosen at that time. Here is the front view measurements comparison of the TG-4 compared to the ZS25.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the TG-4 and ZS25 is 90 and 93 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it can be difficult to see the gap in sensor sizes purely by researching a spec sheet. The pic underneath will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and ZS25.
Clearly, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing and the identical megapixels so you can expect comparable quality of images but you may want to factor the launch date of the cameras into account. The more recent TG-4 will have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Screen and ViewFinder
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Portrait photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Portrait photography camera
manual focus
good MP (16 megapixels)
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
no manual control
cannot use external flash
small sensor (1/2.3")
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Street photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Street photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
no articulating screen
small sensor (1/2.3")
more heavy than average (247g)
image stabilization (Optical)
boasts focus via touch
lighter than competition (193 grams)
fixed screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Sports photography camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Sports photography camera
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16MP)
comes with tracking focus
weather sealing
great battery pack (380 per charge)
max frames per second very slow (5.0 fps)
lack of shutter priority mode
small sensor (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect autofocus
amazing zoom range (24-480mm 20.0 x zoom)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
includes tracking focus
low max shutter speed (1/1,200 seconds)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
terrible battery (260 shots)
no phase detect AF
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoTravel Comparison
Olympus TG-4 Travel photography details
Panasonic ZS25 Travel photography details
great battery pack (380 shots)
weather sealing
good MP (16 megapixels)
flash built-in
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
more heavy than average (247g)
display isn't selfie friendly
lighter than competition (193g)
boasts focus via touch
megapixel count good (16 megapixels)
has built in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very long zoom (480mm)
lack of Time Lapse recording
terrible battery (260 per charge)
display isn't selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesLandscape Comparison
Landscape photography with Olympus TG-4
Landscape photography with Panasonic ZS25
manual focus
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
good sized screen (3")
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
good MP (16 megapixels)
supports RAW files
weather sealing
great battery pack (380 CIPA)
cannot switch lens (fixed lens mount)
no manual control
small sensor (1/2.3")
relatively wide (24mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
megapixel count good (16MP)
lack of manual focus
cannot swap lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
no RAW format
terrible battery (260 CIPA)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Olympus TG-4 as a Vlogging camera
Panasonic ZS25 as a Vlogging camera
quite wide (25mm)
great max aperture (f2.0)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
comes with face detect autofocus
high quality video (1920 x 1080 resolution)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of microphone support
more heavy than average (247 grams)
relatively wide (24mm)
image stabilization (Optical)
high quality video (1920 x 1080 pixels)
lighter than competition (193 grams)
sluggish max aperture (f3.3)
display isn't selfie friendly
lack of mic port
Photography Glossary
Olympus TG-4 vs Panasonic ZS25 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Olympus | Panasonic |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-ZS25 |
| Also called as | - | Lumix DMC-TZ35 |
| Category | Waterproof | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2013-01-07 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4896 x 3672 |
| Highest native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | 23 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 24-480mm (20.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/3.3-6.4 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
| Resolution of display | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 4 seconds | 15 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/1200 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 5.0 frames/s | 10.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 6.40 m |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (220 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247 gr (0.54 pounds) | 193 gr (0.43 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 59 x 28mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 pictures | 260 pictures |
| Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Cost at launch | $379 | $300 |
