Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
92 Imaging
38 Features
54 Overall
44
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Revealed April 2015
- Replaced the Olympus TG-3
- Renewed by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Pentax Q Mount
- 203g - 105 x 58 x 34mm
- Launched August 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Overview
Lets look a bit more closely at the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax Q-S1, former is a Waterproof while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by manufacturers Olympus and Pentax. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the TG-4 (16MP) and Q-S1 (12MP) and the TG-4 (1/2.3") and Q-S1 (1/1.7") offer totally different sensor size.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe TG-4 was introduced 9 months after the Q-S1 so they are of a similar age. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Pentax Q-S1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go right into a thorough comparison, here is a brief summation of how the TG-4 grades versus the Q-S1 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Olympus Tough TG-4 & Pentax Q-S1. The whole galleries are available at Olympus TG-4 Gallery & Pentax Q-S1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Pentax Q-S1
| TG-4 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Launched | April 2015 |  | August 2014 | Newer by 9 months |
Reasons to pick Pentax Q-S1 over the Olympus TG-4
| Q-S1 | TG-4 |
|---|
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax Q-S1
| TG-4 | Q-S1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Dial accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen size |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 460k | The same screen resolution |
| Selfie screen |  | Absent selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to travel with your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and size. The Olympus TG-4 provides exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") along with a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) whilst the Pentax Q-S1 has specifications of 105mm x 58mm x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") with a weight of 203 grams (0.45 lbs).
Look at the Olympus TG-4 and Pentax Q-S1 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you select during that time. Underneath is a front view scale comparison of the TG-4 vs the Q-S1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the TG-4 and Q-S1 is 90 and 92 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by reading specs. The picture below will give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and Q-S1.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 having a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field trickier and the Olympus TG-4 will deliver extra detail using its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop pictures way more aggressively. The more recent TG-4 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Screen and ViewFinder
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-4 vs Pentax Q-S1 Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Q-S1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model type | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Pentax Q-S1 |
| Type | Waterproof | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
| Revealed | 2015-04-13 | 2014-08-04 |
| Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor Chip | TruePic VII | Q Engine |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/1.7" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 41.5mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Total focus points | 25 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | Pentax Q |
| Lens zoom range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | - |
| Largest aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | - |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | - |
| Total lenses | - | 8 |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 4.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
| Screen resolution | 460k dot | 460k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 30 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/8000 secs |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash distance | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 4.90 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash modes | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | Auto, redeye reduction, slow sync, trailing curtain sync |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24p), 1280 x 720 (30, 25, 24p), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 247 grams (0.54 pounds) | 203 grams (0.45 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 105 x 58 x 34mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 images | 250 images |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | LI-92B | D-LI68 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at release | $379 | $250 |