Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR
90 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
90 Imaging
58 Features
54 Overall
56
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 247g - 112 x 66 x 31mm
- Launched April 2015
- Previous Model is Olympus TG-3
- Updated by Olympus TG-5
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 25600
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 28mm (F2.8) lens
- 245g - 117 x 61 x 35mm
- Released April 2013
- Successor is Ricoh GR II
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Overview
Let's take a closer look at the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GR, one is a Waterproof and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the TG-4 (16MP) and the GR (16MP) is very close but the TG-4 (1/2.3") and GR (APS-C) have different sensor measurements.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe TG-4 was manufactured 2 years after the GR which is a fairly serious gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Olympus TG-4 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GR being a Large Sensor Compact camera.
Before diving right into a complete comparison, here is a brief view of how the TG-4 scores versus the GR with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus Tough TG-4 and Ricoh GR. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus TG-4 Gallery and Ricoh GR Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus TG-4 over the Ricoh GR
| TG-4 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Released | April 2015 |  | April 2013 | Newer by 25 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GR over the Olympus TG-4
| GR | TG-4 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 460k | Clearer display (+770k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GR
| TG-4 | GR | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focusing | ||
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Display size | 3" |  | 3" | Same display measurements |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither features selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Olympus TG-4 enjoys outside dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") accompanied by a weight of 247 grams (0.54 lbs) while the Ricoh GR has proportions of 117mm x 61mm x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Analyze the Olympus TG-4 and Ricoh GR in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Here is a front view measurement comparison of the TG-4 vs the GR.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the TG-4 and GR is 90 and 90 respectively.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Sensor Comparison
Generally, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor dimensions simply by viewing specs. The pic below might give you a much better sense of the sensor dimensions in the TG-4 and GR.
All in all, the 2 cameras come with the identical MP but different sensor dimensions. The TG-4 has the smaller sensor which should make obtaining shallower depth of field more difficult. The more recent TG-4 should have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoSports Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesTravel Comparison
Photography GlossaryLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms
Olympus TG-4 vs Ricoh GR Specifications
| Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GR | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Ricoh |
| Model | Olympus Tough TG-4 | Ricoh GR |
| Class | Waterproof | Large Sensor Compact |
| Launched | 2015-04-13 | 2013-04-17 |
| Body design | Compact | Large Sensor Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | TruePic VII | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.7 x 15.7mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 372.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4928 x 3264 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| Center weighted AF | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 25 | - |
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-100mm (4.0x) | 28mm (1x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/2.0-4.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus range | 1cm | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 1.5 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
| Display resolution | 460k dot | 1,230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | Optical (optional) |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 4 seconds | 300 seconds |
| Max shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | 7.90 m (at ISO 1600) | 5.40 m (at ISO 100) |
| Flash settings | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off, LED | - |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Max flash sync | - | 1/4000 seconds |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 ( 60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 25, 24 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | H.264, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
| Microphone input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 247g (0.54 lb) | 245g (0.54 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 31mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.2") | 117 x 61 x 35mm (4.6" x 2.4" x 1.4") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | 78 |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.6 |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 13.5 |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | 972 |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 380 photographs | 290 photographs |
| Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | LI-92B | DB65 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) | Yes |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory | SD, SDHC, SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $379 | $971 |
